505 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658830)
1. Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization: a review of the statutes regulating the social control of the mentally ill.
Gove WR; Tovo M; Hughes M
Deviant Behav; 1985; 6():287-318. PubMed ID: 11658830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An overview of state involuntary civil commitment statutes.
Van Duizend R; McGraw BD; Keilitz I
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 11658581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute.
Vater JA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of statutory change on the civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Peters R; Miller KS; Schmidt W; Meeter D
Law Hum Behav; 1987 Jun; 11(2):73-99. PubMed ID: 11658913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Guidelines for involuntary civil commitment.
National Center for State Courts' Institute on Mental Disability and the Law
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(5):409-514. PubMed ID: 11659039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In search of a sane commitment statute.
Treffert DA; Krajeck RW
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Stromberg CD; Stone AA
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment rights of mentally ill nursing home residents.
Barnett CF
Univ PA Law Rev; 1978 Jan; 126(3):578-629. PubMed ID: 11664875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Least restrictive treatment of involuntary patients: translating concepts into practice.
Keilitz I; Conn D; Giampetro A
St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):691-745. PubMed ID: 11649207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
Zenoff EH; Zients AB
George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
Wallach S
Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Civil commitment of the mentally ill in California: the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act.
Hart MA
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 7(1):93-136. PubMed ID: 11664312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Civil commitment in Alabama.
Segall RD
Ala Law Rev; 1977; 26(1):215-71. PubMed ID: 11664721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment.
Morris GH
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Judicial decisions in civil commitment: facts, attitudes, and psychiatric recommendations.
Hiday VA
Law Soc Rev; 1983; 17(3):517-30. PubMed ID: 11658694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Albany debates plan to force treatment on the mentally ill.
Hernandez R
N Y Times Web; 1999 Jul; ():20. PubMed ID: 11648128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
