These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658853)

  • 1. Reason, revelation and liberal justice: reflections on George Grant's analysis of Roe v. Wade.
    Mathie W
    Can J Polit Sci; 1986 Sep; 19(3):443-66. PubMed ID: 11658853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Logic, law and abortion.
    Degnan M; Pannier R
    Linacre Q; 1992 Feb; 59(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 11652613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Taking rights seriously in the abortion case.
    Dworkin R
    Ratio Juris; 1990 Mar; 3(1):68-80. PubMed ID: 11656052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Constitution and abortion.
    Campbell A
    Mod Law Rev; 1990 Mar; 53(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11656038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled.
    Dworkin R
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
    Lockhart T
    Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
    Martyn K
    UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
    Gelinas A
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion and the right of privacy.
    Ortega ML
    Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social commentary: values and legal personhood.
    Parness JA
    West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
    Rush SE
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
    Coleman JJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The social, theological and biological context of abortion: 10th anniversary reflections on Roe v. Wade.
    Williams GH
    Linacre Q; 1983 Nov; 50(4):335-54. PubMed ID: 11655584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Political effects of court decisions on abortion: a comparison between the United States and the German Federal Republic.
    George J
    Int J Law Fam; 1989 Apr; 3(1):106-36. PubMed ID: 11656044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Floyd v. Anders. 4 Nov 1977.
    U.S. District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
    Fed Suppl; 1977; 440():535-40. PubMed ID: 11646007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
    Rubenfeld J
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The constitutional morality of abortion.
    Brownstein A; Dau P
    Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
    Destro RA
    Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.