These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658865)
21. Commonwealth v. Twitchell: who owns the child? Robinson SD J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():413-32. PubMed ID: 11645693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The approach to the Jehovah's Witness patient. Rothenberg DM Anesthesiol Clin North Am; 1990 Sep; 8(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 11653928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Pentland v. Pentland. Canada. Ontario. Supreme Court Dom Law Rep; 1978 Apr; 86():585-91. PubMed ID: 12041086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Their life is in the blood: Jehovah's Witnesses, blood transfusions and the courts. Moore ML North KY Law Rev; 1983; 10(2):281-304. PubMed ID: 11649715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. When parents refuse consent to medical care for their children: the role of the nurse. Garey CC; Child Leg Rights J; 1996; 16(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 11655110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Praying for relief from parens patriae: should a child be allowed to refuse life-saving medical treatment on religious grounds? Kessler DN Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):673-93. PubMed ID: 11650888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Religious beliefs and life saving therapy. O'Rourke K Health Care Ethics USA; 1997; 5(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11654840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. When minors refuse medical treatment. Teicher SA Christ Sci Monitor; 1999 Feb; ():3. PubMed ID: 11647638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. In re McCauley. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk North East Rep Second Ser; 1991 Jan; 565():411-4. PubMed ID: 12041203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection. Smith SR Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The Karen Quinlan case--a constitutional right to die? Roddy JV Chicago Bar Rec; 1976; 58(3):120-124+. PubMed ID: 11661598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Vaccines and the law. Sanzo M Pepperdine Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 19(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 11659523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The law and death--an overview. Stephan LD; Billings MN J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 11662357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The Jehovah's Witness/blood transfusion dilemma. O'Donnell TJ Med Moral Newsl; 1982 Sep; 19(7):25-8. PubMed ID: 11649506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The treatment of handicapped newborns: is there a role for law? Burt RA Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):279-91. PubMed ID: 11651814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Medical priority of patients' wishes. Dickens BM Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Religious immunity amendment sliced from child abuse reauthorization bill. Skolnick A Med World News; 1984 Sep; 25(17):6-7. PubMed ID: 11645526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The right to die. Logan P Month; 1976 Jun; 9(6):199-202. PubMed ID: 11661306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Reply to Anita Catlin. Rosam E HEC Forum; 1996 Jul; 8(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 11645323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Re S (A Minor) (Medical Treatment). Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division Family Law; 1992 Jul; [1993 Apr]23():215-6. PubMed ID: 11648256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]