These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658865)
41. The Right to Die: Public Health Trust v. Wons -- Florida moves away from Massachusetts and New Jersey toward California and Mississippi despite Cruzan v. Harmon. Gordon DR N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):40-98. PubMed ID: 11652593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey. Sarno JJ Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Culture and religion: their role in ethics. Norris PF Health Care Ethics USA; 1996; 4(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Laetrile: may the state intervene on behalf of a minor? Ainsworth MV; Wall T Univ Kans Law Rev; 1982; 30(3):409-28. PubMed ID: 12083079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Some religious views on the right to die. Washington Post; 1997 Jun; ():B6. PubMed ID: 11648052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The Shulman case and the right to refuse treatment. Sneiderman B Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11651301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond. Phillips CA Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Letting children die for the faith. Swan R Free Inq; 1998-1999 Winter; 19(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11657679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. In re E.G. Illinois. Supreme Court North East Rep Second Ser; 1989 Nov; 549():322-31. PubMed ID: 12041191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Recognizing the right of terminally-ill mature minors to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: the need for legislative guidelines to give full effect to minors' expanded rights. Lonowski SC Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1995-1996 Spring; 34(2):421-45. PubMed ID: 11654443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Treatment of incompetent child: parental wishes and Charter of Rights and Freedoms -- B. v. Children's Aid Society of Metropolitan Toronto. Kennedy I Med Law Rev; 1996; 4(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 11656916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Choosing life after death: respecting religious beliefs and moral convictions in near death decisions. Goldberg CK Syracuse Law Rev; 1988; 39(4):1197-260. PubMed ID: 11653917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. In re Cabrera. Pennsylvania. Superior Court Atl Report; 1989 Jan; 552():1114-21. PubMed ID: 11648182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Religious healing in the courts: the liberties and liabilities of patients, parents, and healers. Nobel B Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1993; 16():599-710. PubMed ID: 11652680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. More on the role of judges. Beyer HA Law Med Health Care; 1982 Sep; 10(4):184-5. PubMed ID: 11643898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Compulsory medical treatment and religious freedom: whose law shall prevail? Paris JJ Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 11661287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Re S (A Minor) (Blood Transfusion: Adoption Order Condition). Cretney S Family Law; 1994 Nov; 24():608-10. PubMed ID: 11657221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Refusal of treatment (child): competence -- Re L (Medical Treatment: Gillick Competency). Grubb A Med Law Rev; 1999; 7(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 11658027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]