393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658912)
1. A medical advancement in search of a legal theory--artificial insemination by donor and the law.
Baylson MM
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1987 Feb; 5(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11658912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
Lorio KV
LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Conceiving for cash; is it legal?: a survey of the laws applicable to surrogate motherhood.
Taylor S
N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1987; 4(Part 2):413-44. PubMed ID: 11650203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Great expectations or convoluted realities: artificial insemination in flux.
Smith GP
Fam Law Rev; 1980; 3():37-44. PubMed ID: 11658615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology.
Smith GP; Iraola R
Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy.
Long SL; Ravenscraft P
Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law.
Wadlington W
Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial insemination and the law.
Jensen BJ
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(4):935-90. PubMed ID: 11658495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Finding fathers: artificial insemination, lesbians, and the law.
Arnup K
Can J Women Law; 1994; 7(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11660009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered?
Lieber KB
Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial insemination by donor: information, communication and regulation.
Gibson EL
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 11659440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion: the father's rights.
Gilbert RA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice.
Feaver PD; Kling R; Plofchan TK
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1992-1993 Winter; 4():211-20. PubMed ID: 11652652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Paternal interests in the abortion decision: does the father have a say?
Diggins M
Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1989; 1989():377-97. PubMed ID: 11656041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Frustrated intentions and binding biology: seeking AID (Artificial Insemination by Donor) in the law.
Schiff AR
Duke Law J; 1994 Dec; 44(3):524-70. PubMed ID: 11660686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity.
O'Brien S
Utah Law Rev; 1987; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Draft ABA Model Surrogacy Act.
American Bar Association. Section of Family Law, Adoption Committee, and Ad Hoc Surrogacy Committee
Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):123-43. PubMed ID: 11659040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The "legitimization" of artificial insemination: promise or problem?
Knoppers BM
Fam Law Rev; 1978 Apr; 1(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 11664957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
