489 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658919)
1. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity.
O'Brien S
Utah Law Rev; 1987; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law.
Wadlington W
Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial conception: legislative approaches.
Krause HD
Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
Lorio KV
LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered?
Lieber KB
Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Conceiving for cash; is it legal?: a survey of the laws applicable to surrogate motherhood.
Taylor S
N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1987; 4(Part 2):413-44. PubMed ID: 11650203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy.
Hofheimer A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
Williams HE
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Who are the parents of biotechnological children?
Palmer LI
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology.
Smith GP; Iraola R
Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference.
Birck ML
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The stork market: the law of the new reproduction technologies.
Andrews LB
ABA J; 1984 Aug; 70(8):50-6. PubMed ID: 11658526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Technology and motherhood: legal and ethical issues in human egg donation.
Robertson JA
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1988-1989; 39(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11659264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal problems of surrogate motherhood.
Black RC
New Engl Law Rev; 1980-1981; 16(3):373-95. PubMed ID: 11649691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
Capron AM
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A medical advancement in search of a legal theory--artificial insemination by donor and the law.
Baylson MM
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1987 Feb; 5(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11658912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Frozen embryos: moral, social, and legal implications.
Wurmbrand MJ
South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1079-100. PubMed ID: 11655851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The surrogate mother contract: in the best interests of society?
Latourette AW
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1990; 25(1):53-92. PubMed ID: 11651389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Contracts to bear a child: the mixed legislative signals.
Wadlington WJ
Ida Law Rev; 1992-1993; 29(2):383-410. PubMed ID: 11652308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
