These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658921)
1. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability. Wallach DM; Berry SJ St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act. Rosen MW Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informing patients about medical risks. Texas Medical Disclosure Panel Tex Med; 1982 Mar; 78(3):36-9. PubMed ID: 11643732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent. Grubbs WG Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent in Kentucky after the Medical Malpractice Insurance and Claims Act of 1976. Curtis JV KY Law J; 1976; 65():524-40. PubMed ID: 11664783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent in Washington: expanded scope of material facts that the physician must disclose to his patient. Rauzi E Wash Law Rev; 1980 Jun; 55(3):655-75. PubMed ID: 11665260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The decline of "informed consent". Plant ML Wash Lee Law Rev; 1978; 35(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 11665008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system. Deardorff SE Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Halligan PD LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed. Kessenick LW; Mankin PA Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent. Penhallegon JR Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Autonomy and privacy: protecting patients from their physicians. Bobinski MA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(2):291-388. PubMed ID: 11659957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent and the material risk standard: a modest proposal. Morton JE Pac Law J; 1981 Jul; 12(4):915-36. PubMed ID: 11658351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes. Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent liability. Recher BC Drake Law Rev; 1976; 26(3):696-715. PubMed ID: 11664787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of the Texas Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act on informed consent recovery in medical malpractice litigation. Elliott FW Tex Tech Law Rev; 1979; 10(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 11665221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]