BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658939)

  • 1. The doctrine of informed consent: protecting the patient's right to make informed health care decisions.
    Studer MR
    Mont Law Rev; 1987; 48(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11658939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An economic analysis of informed consent to medical care.
    Fajfar M
    Georgetown Law J; 1992 Jun; 80(5):1941-71. PubMed ID: 11659918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The expansion of liability for medical accidents: from negligence to strict liability by way of informed consent.
    Meisel A
    Neb Law Rev; 1977; 56(1):51-152. PubMed ID: 11664804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From informed consent to patient choice: a new protected interest.
    Shultz MM
    Yale Law J; 1985 Dec; 95(2):219-99. PubMed ID: 11658859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informed consent: the three tests and a modest proposal for the reality of the patient as an individual.
    Trichter JG; Lewis PW
    South Tex Law J; 1981; 21(2):155-70. PubMed ID: 11658706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The two schools of thought and informed consent doctrines in Pennsylvania: a model for integration.
    Dailey JP
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1994; 98(4):713-37. PubMed ID: 11656548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The meaning of informed consent.
    Whitfield A
    Med Leg J; 1986; 54(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 11653740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informed consent.
    Shaw A; Shaw IA
    Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 11651357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed consent: Alabama announces a new standard for determining proximate cause.
    McFerrin JH
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1986-1987; 17(2):519-32. PubMed ID: 11658966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informed consent--a proposed standard for medical disclosure.
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 48(3):548-63. PubMed ID: 11664279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent.
    Grubbs WG
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Informed consent: a German lesson.
    Shaw J
    Int Comp Law Q; 1986 Oct; 35(4):864-90. PubMed ID: 11659183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed consent and the material risk standard: a modest proposal.
    Morton JE
    Pac Law J; 1981 Jul; 12(4):915-36. PubMed ID: 11658351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of the doctrine of informed consent.
    Georgia Law Rev; 1978; 12(3):581-611. PubMed ID: 11664967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The patient's right to know -- a comparative view.
    Giesen D; Hayes J
    Anglo Am Law Rev; 1992; 21(2):101-22. PubMed ID: 11659667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Demanded medical care.
    Menikoff J
    Ariz State Law J; 1998; 30(4):1091-126. PubMed ID: 11660771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patients, agents, and informed consent.
    Haber JG
    J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1():43-59.. PubMed ID: 11658933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed consent: alternatives for Illinois.
    Holmstrom JT
    Univ Ill Law Forum; 1973; 1973(4):739-56. PubMed ID: 11664278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical malpractice: informed consent cases in "full-disclosure" jurisdictions.
    Seidelson DE
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1976; 14(3):309-47. PubMed ID: 11664631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who's afraid of informed consent? An affirmative approach to the medical malpractice crisis.
    Fierstein RK
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 1978; 44(2):241-84. PubMed ID: 11661552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.