232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658939)
21. Informed consent in the prescription drug context: the special case.
Tietz GF
Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):367-417. PubMed ID: 11652502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Informed consent--a fairy tale? Law's vision.
Katz J
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1977; 39(2):137-74. PubMed ID: 11661530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Informed consent: the law's uneasy compromise with ethical theory.
Weisbard AJ
Neb Law Rev; 1986; 65(4):749-67. PubMed ID: 11658870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Apologetic tort think: autonomy and information torts.
Terry NP
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):189-98. PubMed ID: 11656323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The therapeutic justification for withholding medical information: what you don't know can't hurt you, or can it?
Patterson EG
Neb Law Rev; 1985; 64(4):721-71. PubMed ID: 11649808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Informed choice: physicians' duty to disclose nonreadily available alternatives.
Terrion HF
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1993; 43(2):491-523. PubMed ID: 11659829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.
Boland GL
LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Informed refusal: an unnecessary burden on physicians?
Shank S
UMKC Law Rev; 1981; 49(3):365-76. PubMed ID: 11658619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Rethinking informed consent.
Schuck PH
Yale Law J; 1994 Jan; 103(4):899-959. PubMed ID: 11659806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Informed consent: risk disclosure and the Canadian approach.
Jazvac WP
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1978; 36(2):191-208. PubMed ID: 11664977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Informed consent: should doctors tell the truth?
Riskin LL
Boston Univ J; 1975; 23(3):12-20. PubMed ID: 11664687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Shock therapy and informed consent.
Gilbert DT
Ill Bar J; 1981 Jan; 69(5):272-278, 287. PubMed ID: 11658617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. New trends in informed consent?
Jaeckel LB
Neb Law Rev; 1975; 54(1):66-92. PubMed ID: 11664487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparative study of the law relating to the physician's duty to obtain the patient's "informed consent" to medical treatment in England and California.
Churchward AB
Conn J Int Law; 1990; 5(2):483-563. PubMed ID: 11659375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Some problems in gaining informed consent from psychiatric patients.
Macklin R
Emory Law J; 1982; 31(2):345-74. PubMed ID: 11653484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Beyond informed consent.
Szczygiel A
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(1):171-262. PubMed ID: 11660078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Informed consent: the illusion of patient choice.
Rice N
Emory Law J; 1974; 23(2):503-22. PubMed ID: 11664432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Autonomy and privacy: protecting patients from their physicians.
Bobinski MA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(2):291-388. PubMed ID: 11659957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Public psychiatry and the right to refuse treatment: toward an effective damage remedy.
Furrow BR
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1984; 19(1):21-60. PubMed ID: 11658667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
