These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658939)
61. The performance of invasive procedures by HIV-infected doctors: the duty to disclose under the informed consent doctrine. DeBarge MW Conn Law Rev; 1993; 25(3):991-1025. PubMed ID: 11659692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Surgery by an unauthorized surgeon as a battery. Lundmark T J Law Health; 1995-1996; 10(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 11657413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis. Monks SS Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Cheung v. Cunningham. New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division Atl Report; 1987 Jan; 520():832-7. PubMed ID: 11648565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Informed consent in human experimentation: bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice. Delgado R; Leskovac H UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):67-130. PubMed ID: 11659049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Informed dissent: a new corollary to the informed consent doctrine? Friedman DA Chic Kent Law Rev; 1981; 57(4):1119-44. PubMed ID: 11658347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Halligan PD LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Informed consent to medical treatment. Robertson G Law Q Rev; 1981 Jan; 97():102-26. PubMed ID: 11665264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Informed consent for the terminal patient. Rutledge TA Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 11660876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Consent to treatment--how informed is informed consent? Brahams D Med Leg J; 1984; 52(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 11658727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule. Karlson HC; Erwin RD Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed. Kessenick LW; Mankin PA Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Oh, didn't I tell you? A look at informed consent. Greenwald AE Trial; 1982 Jun; 18(6):54-56, 85. PubMed ID: 11658483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Halley v. Birbiglia. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Dec; 390():540-50. PubMed ID: 12041108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Informed consent: ethical considerations for physicians and surgeons. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Biomedical Ethics Committee Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1986 Nov; 19(6):421-2. PubMed ID: 11658802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Informed consent: from disclosure to patient participation in medical decisionmaking. Simpson RE Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 76(1):172-207. PubMed ID: 11658361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Coercive behavior control in the schools: reconciling "individually appropriate" education with damaging changes in educational status. Jones RW Stanford Law Rev; 1976 Nov; 29(1):93-125. PubMed ID: 11664742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Medical malpractice: expert opinion unnecessary to establish claim based on doctrine of informed consent. Minn Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 63(4):695-706. PubMed ID: 11665186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Informed consent to immunization: the risks and benefits of individual autonomy. Woolley AP Calif Law Rev; 1977 Dec; 65(6):1286-314. PubMed ID: 11664887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]