These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658941)
1. Maternal substance abuse: the need to provide legal protection for the fetus. Balisy SS South Calif Law Rev; 1987 May; 60(4):1209-38. PubMed ID: 11658941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate. Bennett B Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection. Johnsen DE Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Adventures in babysitting: gestational surrogate mother tort liability. Bussel KA Duke Law J; 1991 Dec; 41(3):661-90. PubMed ID: 11659580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fetal abuse: an exploration of emerging philosophic, legal, and policy issues. Losco J West Polit Q; 1989 Jun; 42(2):265-86. PubMed ID: 11659161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mama vs. fetus. Hornick HL Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Criminal liability for substance abuse during pregnancy: the controversy of maternal v. fetal rights. Dobson T; Eby KK St Louis Univ Law J; 1992; 36(3):655-94. PubMed ID: 11659686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy. Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Recovery for prenatal injuries: the right of a child against its mother. Chernaik BI Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1976; 10(3):582-609. PubMed ID: 11664595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway? Goldberg S Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):591-623. PubMed ID: 11649263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protecting parents' freedom to have children with genetic differences. Shepherd L Univ Ill Law Rev; 1995; 4():761-812. PubMed ID: 11658115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos. Goldberg S Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution. Dawson TB Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost? Manson R; Marolt J Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Judicial intervention in pregnancy. Martin S; Coleman M McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The maternal abdominal wall: a fortress against fetal health care? Phelan JP South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):461-90. PubMed ID: 11645842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]