166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658945)
1. Three generations, no imbeciles: new light on Buck v. Bell.
Lombardo PA
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1985 Apr; 60(1):30-62. PubMed ID: 11658945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Modern judicial treatment of procreative rights of developmentally disabled persons: equal rights to procreation and sterilization.
Jaegers EM
J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Fall; 31(4):947-79. PubMed ID: 11660196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sterilization of the retarded: a problem or a solution?
Murdock CW
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):917-35. PubMed ID: 11663463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Involuntary sterilization of mentally disabled women.
Cepko R
Berkeley Womens Law J; 1993; 8():122-65. PubMed ID: 11659702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The wicked witch is almost dead: Buck v. Bell and the sterilization of handicapped persons.
Burgdorf RL; Burgdorf MP
Temple Law Q; 1977; 50(4):995-1034. PubMed ID: 11664886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The biological alteration cases.
Gelman S
William Mary Law Rev; 1995 May; 36(4):1203-301. PubMed ID: 11660332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden?
Coleman SS
S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11665097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The conflict between "disabling" and "enabling" paradigms in law: sterilization, the developmentally disabled, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Dugan JC
Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 78(3):507-42. PubMed ID: 11659683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough.
Estacio RA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The medicalization of repression: eugenics and crime.
Katz J; Abel CF
Contemp Crisis; 1984 Jul; 8(3):227-41. PubMed ID: 11658714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The sterilization of Carrie Buck.
Gaylord CL
Case Comment; 1978; 83(5):18-20+. PubMed ID: 11662508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Involuntary sexual sterilization of incompetents in Alabama: past, present, and future.
Larson EJ; Nelson LJ
Ala Law Rev; 1992; 43(2):399-444. PubMed ID: 11659705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore.
Gauvey SK; Shuger NB
Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sterilization of the developmentally disabled: shedding some myth-conceptions.
Ross DH
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1981; 9(4):599-643. PubMed ID: 11658741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. From involuntary sterilization to genetic enhancement: the unsettled legacy of Buck v. Bell.
Berry RM
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):401-48. PubMed ID: 12755089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Va. apologizes to the victims of sterilizations.
Branigin W
Washington Post; 2002 May; ():B1, B9. PubMed ID: 17333594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The creation of a haven for 'human thoroughbreds': the sterilization of the feeble-minded and the mentally ill in British Columbia.
McLaren A
Can Hist Rev; 1986 Jun; 67(2):127-50. PubMed ID: 11650050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Eugenic sterilization statutes: a constitutional re-evaluation.
Dunn R
J Fam Law; 1975; 14(2):280-308. PubMed ID: 11662978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sterilization, segregation and community care: ideology and solutions to the problem of mental deficiency in inter-war Britain.
Thomson M
Hist Psychiatry; 1992 Dec; 3(12):473-98. PubMed ID: 11645803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and eugenics in Nazi Germany.
David HP; Fleischhacker J; Höhn C
Popul Dev Rev; 1988 Mar; 14(1):81-112. PubMed ID: 11655915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
