470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658947)
21. United States: the right to die--tangles between medicine and the law.
Lancet; 1984 Feb; 1(8373):387-8. PubMed ID: 11644278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Metropolitan New York Ethics Committee Network: coming together at a time of concern.
Zuckerman C
Fordham Int Law J; 1993 Mar; 5(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 11651585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. New Jersey Advance Directives for Health Care Act.
New Jersey
N J Statut Annot N J; 1991 Jul; Chapt. 201 Sects. 26.2H.53 to 26.2H.78():26:2H-53 to 26:2H-78. PubMed ID: 12043617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Advance directives: the United States experience.
Cranford RE
Humane Med; 1993 Jan; 9(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11652943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Searching for proper judicial recognition of hospital ethics committees in decisions to forego medical treatment.
Murphy CA
Gold Gate Law Rev; 1990; 20(2):319-44. PubMed ID: 11651055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Cruzan legacy: legislative and judicial responses and insights for the future.
Gieszl HC; Velasco PA
Ariz State Law J; 1992; 24(2):719-801. PubMed ID: 11654081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Hospice: the legal ramification of a place to die.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1981; 56(4):673-702. PubMed ID: 11658767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Institutional ethics: hospital practices and policies for denying life-sustaining treatment.
Ross J; Wenger N
Whittier Law Rev; 1994; 15(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 11652884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Premature infants: a legal approach to decision-making in neonatal intensive care.
Gorski SL
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1985; 19(3-4):261-81. PubMed ID: 11649774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The right to die: medico-legal implications of In re Quinlan.
Hirsh HL; Donovan RE
Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):267-303. PubMed ID: 11661462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Hospital ethics committees and the law. Introduction.
Hollinger PC
MD Law Rev; 1991; 50(3):742-5. PubMed ID: 11651205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.
Rhoden NK
South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Classification of critically ill patients: a legal examination.
Fama AJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1980 Oct; 24(3):514-33. PubMed ID: 11665253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Responses to "From ethical dilemma to hospital policy.
Bader D; Miles J
Health Prog; 1991 Nov; 72(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11645705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The ethics committee at work.
Rubinow MB
Conn Med; 1984 Nov; 48(11):759. PubMed ID: 11644172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983).
Chrisman JP
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Model Procedures for Child Protective Service Agencies Responding to Reports of Withholding Medically Indicated Treatment from Disabled Infants with Life-Threatening Conditions.
Nicholson EB; Horowitz RM; Parry J; ;
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(3):221-49. PubMed ID: 11651933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A new predicament for physicians: the concept of medical futility, the physician's obligation to render inappropriate treatment, and the interplay of the medical standard of care.
Levine EM
J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):69-108. PubMed ID: 11654456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
