473 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658950)
1. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
Rhoden NK
Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women.
Daniels JA
Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
Scott C
Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1994 May; 10(4):615-89. PubMed ID: 11656420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means?
Drigotas EE
North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
Gallagher J
Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
Leavine BA
Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond abortion: refusal of caesarean section.
Mahowald M
Bioethics; 1989 Apr; 3(2):106-21. PubMed ID: 11649241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lives at stake: how to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life.
Tauer CA
Health Prog; 1992 Sep; 73(3):18, 20-27. PubMed ID: 11652082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
Bennett B
Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy.
Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
Levine EM
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A serious obligation Sharpening a moral argument.
Pellegrino ED; Walter JJ; Tauer CA
Health Prog; 1992 Dec; 73(10):6-7. PubMed ID: 11645751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Toward guidelines for compelling cesarean surgery: of rights, responsibility, and decisional authenticity.
Finer JJ
Minn Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 76(2):239-94. PubMed ID: 11659551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Compulsory treatment of pregnant women.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 May; 1(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The maternal abdominal wall: a fortress against fetal health care?
Phelan JP
South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):461-90. PubMed ID: 11645842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Self-identification and the morality of abortion.
Lusby K
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):121-58. PubMed ID: 11656258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Furthering the inquiry: race, class, and culture in the forced medical treatment of pregnant women.
Ikemoto LC
Tenn Law Rev; 1992; 59(3):487-517. PubMed ID: 11652636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Can a pregnant woman morally refuse fetal surgery?
Knopoff KA
Calif Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 79(2):499-540. PubMed ID: 11659841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost?
Manson R; Marolt J
Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
