522 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659041)
1. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
Capron AM
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.
American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee
Fertil Steril; 1990 Jun; 53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S. PubMed ID: 11659223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.
American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee
Fertil Steril; 1986 Sep; 46(3) Suppl. 1):1S-94S. PubMed ID: 11658710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
Lorio KV
LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial conception: legislative approaches.
Krause HD
Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy.
Hofheimer A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In the beginning: the legal status of early embryos.
Robertson JA
Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):437-517. PubMed ID: 11659369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificially assisted conception.
Long LL
Health Law Can; 1985; 5(4):89-107. PubMed ID: 11645666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive technology and international mechanisms of protection of the human person.
Knoppers BM
McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):336-58. PubMed ID: 11658935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal aspects of artificial human reproduction: can the law afford to play ostrich?
Clapshaw D
Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 4(3):254-72. PubMed ID: 11658651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The human preembryo, the progenitors, and the state: toward a dynamic theory of status, rights, and research policy.
Martin PA; Lagod ML
High Technol Law J; 1990; 5(2):257-310. PubMed ID: 11659412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues.
Field M
Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
Williams HE
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Egg donation, motherhood and state law reform: a commentary on Professor Palmer's proposals.
Strouse DS
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 11660335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dilemmas of the new birth technologies.
Thom M
Ms; 1988 May; 16(11):70-72, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11658995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Liberty and assisted reproduction.
Robertson JA
Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):48-53. PubMed ID: 11654494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prohibiting payments to surrogate mothers: love's labor lost and the constitutional right to privacy.
Bradley TS
John Marshall Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):715-45. PubMed ID: 11650095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate.
Langley DB
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Allocation of decision-making rights to frozen embryos.
Poole EK
Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(1):67-102. PubMed ID: 11659329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
