These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659043)

  • 1. State prohibition of fetal experimentation and the fundamental right of privacy.
    Clapp MJ
    Columbia Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 88(5):1073-97. PubMed ID: 11659043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal tissue transplants: restricting recipient designation.
    Danis MW
    Hastings Law J; 1988 Jul; 39(5):1079-107. PubMed ID: 11659060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal research IV: the living fetus and the law--the state's role.
    Kindregan CP
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):133-44. PubMed ID: 11663566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal tissue transplantation: regulating the medical hope for the future.
    Sedlak JF
    J Law Health; 1989-1990; 4(1):57-81. PubMed ID: 11659312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The practice/theory dilemma: personal reflections on the Louisiana abortion case.
    Colker R
    Hastings Law J; 1992 Apr; 43(4):1195-257. PubMed ID: 11656210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The regulation of fetal tissue transplantation: different legislative models for different purposes.
    Hicks SC
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1613-29. PubMed ID: 11657050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
    Witherspoon JP
    St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum.
    Wilson JP
    Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judicial supremacy, right-to-life and the abortion decision.
    Lindholm LM
    Public Aff Q; 1988 Apr; 2(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11651912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal tissue research: legal regulation of human fetal tissue transplantation.
    Gelfand G; Levin TR
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):647-94. PubMed ID: 11656327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
    Haley JN
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting the future of privacy in pregnancy: how medical technology affects the legal rights of pregnant women.
    Annas GJ
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):329-53. PubMed ID: 11650347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Webster, privacy, and RU486.
    Haas EM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():277-96. PubMed ID: 11645679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On human experimentation.
    DeMarco D
    Hum Life Rev; 1983; 9(4):48-60. PubMed ID: 11655592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test tube babies: legal issues raised by in vitro fertilization.
    Flannery DM
    Georgetown Law J; 1979 Aug; 67(6):1295-345. PubMed ID: 11664058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Live birth: a condition precedent to recognition of rights.
    Crockett KG; Hyman M
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):805-36. PubMed ID: 11664599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal experimentation: protocols, propriety and parameters.
    Meechan CM
    Queens Law J; 1985; 11(1):166-97. PubMed ID: 11659023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolving conceptualizations of property: a proposal to de-commercialize the value of fetal tissue.
    Field NE
    Yale Law J; 1989 Oct; 99(1):169-86. PubMed ID: 11659215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The future of fetal research in California: a proposal for change.
    Lehmann PL
    San Diego Law Rev; 1978 Jul; 15(4):859-86. PubMed ID: 11664975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.