334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659043)
1. State prohibition of fetal experimentation and the fundamental right of privacy.
Clapp MJ
Columbia Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 88(5):1073-97. PubMed ID: 11659043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal tissue transplants: restricting recipient designation.
Danis MW
Hastings Law J; 1988 Jul; 39(5):1079-107. PubMed ID: 11659060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal research IV: the living fetus and the law--the state's role.
Kindregan CP
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):133-44. PubMed ID: 11663566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal tissue transplantation: regulating the medical hope for the future.
Sedlak JF
J Law Health; 1989-1990; 4(1):57-81. PubMed ID: 11659312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The practice/theory dilemma: personal reflections on the Louisiana abortion case.
Colker R
Hastings Law J; 1992 Apr; 43(4):1195-257. PubMed ID: 11656210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The regulation of fetal tissue transplantation: different legislative models for different purposes.
Hicks SC
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1613-29. PubMed ID: 11657050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum.
Wilson JP
Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Judicial supremacy, right-to-life and the abortion decision.
Lindholm LM
Public Aff Q; 1988 Apr; 2(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11651912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fetal tissue research: legal regulation of human fetal tissue transplantation.
Gelfand G; Levin TR
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):647-94. PubMed ID: 11656327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
Haley JN
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting the future of privacy in pregnancy: how medical technology affects the legal rights of pregnant women.
Annas GJ
Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):329-53. PubMed ID: 11650347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Webster, privacy, and RU486.
Haas EM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():277-96. PubMed ID: 11645679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. On human experimentation.
DeMarco D
Hum Life Rev; 1983; 9(4):48-60. PubMed ID: 11655592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Test tube babies: legal issues raised by in vitro fertilization.
Flannery DM
Georgetown Law J; 1979 Aug; 67(6):1295-345. PubMed ID: 11664058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Live birth: a condition precedent to recognition of rights.
Crockett KG; Hyman M
Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):805-36. PubMed ID: 11664599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal experimentation: protocols, propriety and parameters.
Meechan CM
Queens Law J; 1985; 11(1):166-97. PubMed ID: 11659023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolving conceptualizations of property: a proposal to de-commercialize the value of fetal tissue.
Field NE
Yale Law J; 1989 Oct; 99(1):169-86. PubMed ID: 11659215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The future of fetal research in California: a proposal for change.
Lehmann PL
San Diego Law Rev; 1978 Jul; 15(4):859-86. PubMed ID: 11664975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
