532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659051)
1. The evolution of the right to privacy after Roe v. Wade.
Barnard D
Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2 3):365-525. PubMed ID: 11659051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
Kudner KE
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproduction and the law.
Erickson NS
Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 11649200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Workability of the undue burden test.
Schneider EA
Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
Jones CJ
Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
Kunz KA
Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
Pirner RK; Williams LB
Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process.
Goldstein RD
William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors.
Schmidt CG
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
Pine RN; Law SA
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom.
Copelon R
Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion--an update.
Guthman HL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 11649201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
Sourial WH
Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
Berlin SI
Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power.
Paul EW; Klassel D
Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
Wardle LD
Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
Heller S
Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Normative judgment, social change, and legal reasoning in the context of abortion and privacy.
Schnably SJ
Rev Law Soc Change; 1984-1985; 13(4):715-910. PubMed ID: 11659092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts.
Chaput KA
Oregon Law Rev; 1991; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
