532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659051)
21. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate.
Simmons PD
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
Linton PB
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The future of abortion.
McDaniel A
Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The right of minors to confidential access to contraceptives.
Morano AL
Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):214-40. PubMed ID: 11658598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Constitution and the anomaly of the pregnant teenager.
Buchanan E
Ariz Law Rev; 1982; 24(3):553-610. PubMed ID: 11658425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
Henry KS
Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes.
Allen AL
Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Woman, womb, and bodily integrity.
Neff CL
Yale J Law Fem; 1991; 3(2):327-53. PubMed ID: 11656226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
Prall S
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
Casurella JG; Schrock CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future.
Joseph MA
New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The constitutional morality of abortion.
Brownstein A; Dau P
Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The legacy of Justice William Brennan.
Glendon MA; Treene EW
Hum Life Rev; 1998; 24(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 11660508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy.
Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Abortion: a new round.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Parental notification and public policy.
Diamond EF
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 11656615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions.
Wolff MH; Hawn RH
Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
Destro RA
Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The viability of the trimester approach.
Calder KA
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
Embree MG; Dobson TA
Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
