532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659051)
41. Constitutional law--right to privacy--municipal roadblock to abortion denounced--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 103 S.Ct. 2481(1983).
Crusius CJ
Seton Hall Law Rev; 1984; 14(3):658-82. PubMed ID: 11658811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Abortion and the right of privacy.
Ortega ML
Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled.
Dworkin R
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. How rights are infringed: the role of undue burden analysis in constitutional doctrine.
Brownstein A
Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):867-959. PubMed ID: 11656422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Legal abortion under fierce attack 15 years after Roe v. Wade ruling.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1988 May; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The role of minors in health care decision making: current legal issues.
Waxse DJ
Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(4):17-21. PubMed ID: 11654286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Abortion rights of minors weighed.
Taylor S
N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():B32. PubMed ID: 11647378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote.
Taylor S
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.
Nivala J
Const Law J; 1993; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Will Roe v. Wade survive the Rehnquist Court?
Johnsen D; Wilder M
Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):457-69. PubMed ID: 11650350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
Farber DA; Nowak JE
Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Some thoughts on autonomy and equality in relation to Roe v. Wade.
Ginsburg RB
North Carol Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 63(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 11656660
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study.
Olmstead FH
Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Abortion: trouble ahead.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Privacy and abortion rights under the Louisiana state constitution: could Roe v. Wade be alive and well in the Bayou state?
Devlin J
LA Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 51(4):685-732. PubMed ID: 11656097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Constitutional law--a minor's abortion right under a parental notice statute.
Czarnecki MS
Wayne Law Rev; 1982; 28(4):1901-28. PubMed ID: 11658440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Unemancipated minors' rights of access to contraceptives without parental consent or notice--the squeal rule and beyond.
Best M
Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 1983; 8(2):219-50. PubMed ID: 11658756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Imposing morality: the pediatrician as parental agent.
Goldblatt AD
Politics Life Sci; 1996 Sep; 15(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 11654802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
