These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659051)

  • 61. Autonomy's magic wand: abortion and constitutional interpretation.
    Allen AL
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1992 Sep; 72(4):683-98. PubMed ID: 11656223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction.
    Patton DE
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Right to abortion limited: the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of parental notification statutes.
    Byrne TJ
    Loyola Law Rev; 1982; 28(1):281-96. PubMed ID: 11658437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Colker R
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
    Hatch OG
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Jones v. Smith.
    U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida
    Fed Suppl; 1979 Jul; 474():1160-72. PubMed ID: 11648523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The judicial portrayal of the physician in abortion and sterilization decisions: the use and abuse of medical discretion.
    Asaro A
    Harv Womens Law J; 1983; 6(1):51-102. PubMed ID: 11658431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible.
    Law SA
    Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Justices deadlocked on state laws restricting minors' access to abortion.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():B16. PubMed ID: 11646635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. States may require girl to notify parents before having abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
    Bezanson RP
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. An analysis of the 1974 Massachusetts Abortion Statute and a minor's right to abortion.
    Malfa KA
    New Engl Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):417-54. PubMed ID: 11664438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
    Coleman JJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Abortion rights in America.
    Bullock JR
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The law of fertility regulation in the United States: a 1980 review.
    Isaacs SL
    J Fam Law; 1980-1981; 19(1):65-96. PubMed ID: 11663114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
    Frame DW
    West VA Law Rev; 1983; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Teen-agers and abortion.
    Goodman E
    Washington Post; 1983 Jun; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G
    Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.