These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659097)

  • 1. Confidentiality and young people.
    Gillick V
    Ethics Med; 1988; 4(2):21-3. PubMed ID: 11659097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A disturbing judgment by the Court of Appeal.
    Lancet; 1985 Jan; 1(8419):24-5. PubMed ID: 11644441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority.
    Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Nov 19-Dec 20 (date of decision); 1985(1):533-59. PubMed ID: 11648530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Professional confidence in relation to young persons who seek treatment concerning pregnancy or contraceptive advice.
    Great Britain. General Medical Council
    Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8426):470. PubMed ID: 11644443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Under-age contraception--whose responsibility?
    S Afr Med J; 1983 Oct; 64(16):603-4. PubMed ID: 11644057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parental notification and public policy.
    Diamond EF
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 11656615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parental notification requirements applicable to projects for family planning services; final rule.
    U.S. Public Health Service
    Fed Regist; 1983 Jan; 48(18):3600-14. PubMed ID: 11645488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Canadian perspective on adolescent sexuality and public policy: requiring parental involvement is bad law and bad medicine.
    Bala M; Bala N
    Politics Life Sci; 1996 Sep; 15(2):285-7. PubMed ID: 11654801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further thoughts on Mrs. Gillick's case.
    Wells W
    Lancet; 1985 Nov; 2(8464):1138-9. PubMed ID: 11644491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contraception and the under-16s.
    Lancet; 1985 Apr; 1(8432):827. PubMed ID: 11644482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Irish abortion: seeking refuge in a jurisprudence of doubt and delegation.
    Fox M; Murphy T
    J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):454-66. PubMed ID: 11656231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kids, sex, and contraceptives: dilemmas in a liberal society.
    Merrick JC
    Politics Life Sci; 1996 Sep; 15(2):281-2. PubMed ID: 11654799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concern at Gillick judgment.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6464):336. PubMed ID: 11652426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion: a new round.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parental notification rule rejected again.
    Kamen A
    Washington Post; 1983 Jul; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 11646365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The doctor and the underage girl.
    Slack K
    Christ Century; 1985 Feb; 102(6):174-6. PubMed ID: 11653712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion rule for under-18's upset by judge.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Nov; ():6. PubMed ID: 11647824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. U.S. defending notifying parents on birth control.
    Pear R
    N Y Times Web; 1984 Mar; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11646453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion's hardest cases.
    Carlson M
    Time; 1990 Jul; 136(2):22-7. PubMed ID: 11645680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adolescent access to contraception: a rights-based approach.
    Albisa C
    Politics Life Sci; 1996 Sep; 15(2):283-4. PubMed ID: 11654800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.