These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659118)
21. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas. Cluff CA Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent. Penhallegon JR Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act. Rosen MW Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Informed consent in Kentucky after the Medical Malpractice Insurance and Claims Act of 1976. Curtis JV KY Law J; 1976; 65():524-40. PubMed ID: 11664783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed. Kessenick LW; Mankin PA Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Malpractice: questions of consent in connection with treatment of genital or urinary organs. Frantz LB Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1979; 89():32-77. PubMed ID: 12091927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Patient consent in Louisiana. Dewey EP Loyola Law Rev; 1981; 27(4):1166-83. PubMed ID: 11658777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Patients' rights and informed consent: an emergency case for hospitals? Callan DE Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 12(2):406-28. PubMed ID: 11664656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The doctrine of informed consent. Stewart T Insur Couns J; 1976 Jan; 43(1):118-34. PubMed ID: 11664632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Rogers v. Whitaker and informed consent in Australia: a fair dinkum duty of disclosure. Chalmers D; Schwartz R Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 11660490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Amniocentesis in medicine and law: practice standards and legal ramifications. Fineberg KS; Peters JD Trial; 1984 Feb; 20(2):54-56, 58-59. PubMed ID: 11658749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Informed consent and the material risk standard: a modest proposal. Morton JE Pac Law J; 1981 Jul; 12(4):915-36. PubMed ID: 11658351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Informed dissent: a new corollary to the informed consent doctrine? Friedman DA Chic Kent Law Rev; 1981; 57(4):1119-44. PubMed ID: 11658347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of the Texas Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act on informed consent recovery in medical malpractice litigation. Elliott FW Tex Tech Law Rev; 1979; 10(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 11665221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Informed consent in Washington: expanded scope of material facts that the physician must disclose to his patient. Rauzi E Wash Law Rev; 1980 Jun; 55(3):655-75. PubMed ID: 11665260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Doctors may reap lawsuits without informed consent. Med World News; 1984 Feb; 25(4):112-3. PubMed ID: 11645508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical malpractice, informed consent and human experimentation in Western Europe. Deutsch E Int J Med Law; 1979; 1(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 11662749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Informed consent: risk disclosure and the Canadian approach. Jazvac WP Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1978; 36(2):191-208. PubMed ID: 11664977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Physicians with AIDS: a proposal for efficient disclosure. Hertz J Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(2):749-78. PubMed ID: 11659904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]