These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659138)

  • 21. The Infertility Treatment Act 1995. No. 63 of 1995. Date of assent: 27 Jun 1995.
    Australia. Victoria
    Int Dig Health Legis; 1997; 48(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 11656775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Yours, mine and theirs.
    Andrews LB
    Psychol Today; 1984 Dec; 18(12):20-9. PubMed ID: 11658476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Artificial conception: legislative approaches.
    Krause HD
    Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reproductive technology: in Israel, law, religious orthodoxy, and reproductive technologies.
    Shapira A
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S12-4. PubMed ID: 11644021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Law No. 35/1988 of 22 Nov 1988 on Assisted Reproduction Procedures (Boletín Oficial del Estado, 24 Nov 1988, No. 282, pp. 33373-33378).
    Spain
    Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 11659178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Guidelines for performing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET) as a method of treating human sterility.
    German Medical Association. Federal Medical Board. Scientific Advisory Board
    World Med J; 1986; 33(2-3):25-9. PubMed ID: 11659000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Legal issues of the new reproductive technologies.
    Kinney LH
    Calif State Bar J; 1977; 52(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 11665044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reproductive technology and the procreation rights of the unmarried.
    Harv Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 98(3):669-85. PubMed ID: 11649801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prior agreements for disposition of frozen embryos.
    Robertson JA
    Ohio State Law J; 1990; 51(2):407-24. PubMed ID: 11652816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
    ;
    Fam Law Rep (Wash D C); 1989 Feb; 15(16):2009-16. PubMed ID: 11659181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Austria: a legal ban on surrogate mothers and fathers?
    Bernat E; Straka U
    J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Spring; 31(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 11660068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Jewish views of hi-tech birth.
    Berenbaum M
    Moment; 1987 Nov; 12(6):16-21. PubMed ID: 11658899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The embryo as a legal entity -- woman as a fetal environment: the new German laws on reproductive engineering and embryo research.
    Waldschmidt A
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):209-22. PubMed ID: 11651216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Norwegian law on assisted reproduction and genetics: the act relating to the application of biotechnology in medicine.
    Norway
    Bull Med Ethics; 1994; No. 99():8-11. PubMed ID: 11659892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Will your grandchild be a test-tube baby?
    Guentert K
    US Cathol; 1977 Jun; 42(6):6-11. PubMed ID: 11664813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Embryos, families, and procreative liberty: the legal structure of the new reproduction.
    Robertson JA
    South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):939-1041. PubMed ID: 11655852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gamete dealers.
    Dufort B
    Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Apr; No. 97():21-2. PubMed ID: 11659805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hecht v. Superior Court: recognizing a property right in reproductive material.
    Collins JL
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1994-1995 Summer; 33(3):661-84. PubMed ID: 11660116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 15 vials of sperm: the unusual bequest of an even more unusual man.
    Margolick D
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Apr; ():B18. PubMed ID: 11647973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reproductive technology: in Japan, consensus has limits.
    Bai K; Shirai Y; Ishii M
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S18-20. PubMed ID: 11644024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.