These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659149)
1. Regulating IVF human embryo experimentation: the search for a legal basis. Kasimba P Aust Law J; 1988 Feb; 62(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 11659149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tempest in the laboratory: medical research on spare embryos from in vitro fertilization. Gregoratos B Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):977-1006. PubMed ID: 11655859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The legal status of the embryo. Andrews LB Loyola Law Rev; 1986; 32(2):357-409. PubMed ID: 11658916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life. Parness JA; Pritchard SK Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Waller, Warnock and Roe v. Wade: variations on the status of the orphan embryo--comment. Van de Weghe B J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():231-54. PubMed ID: 11645586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Alas! poor Yorick," I knew him ex utero: the regulation of embryo and fetal experimentation and disposal in England and the United States. Terry NP Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 39(3):419-70. PubMed ID: 11658869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive technology and international mechanisms of protection of the human person. Knoppers BM McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):336-58. PubMed ID: 11658935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The legal status of the unborn after Webster. Parness JA Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection. Johnsen DE Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law. Cica N Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative judicial embryology: judges' approaches to unborn human life. Dickens BM Can J Fam Law; 1990; 9(1):180-92. PubMed ID: 11656080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion and the right of privacy. Ortega ML Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to life in law: the embryo and fetus, the body and soul, the family and society. Hicks SC Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1991; 19(3):805-50. PubMed ID: 11656190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Va. debates law on fetal homicide: legislation entangled with abortion issue. Nakashima E Washington Post; 1996 Feb; ():D1, D5. PubMed ID: 11647497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence. Buckley M NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Allocation of decision-making rights to frozen embryos. Poole EK Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(1):67-102. PubMed ID: 11659329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases. Klasing MS Pepperdine Law Rev; 1995; 22(3):933-79. PubMed ID: 11660413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]