These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection. Johnsen DE Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Maternal substance abuse: the need to provide legal protection for the fetus. Balisy SS South Calif Law Rev; 1987 May; 60(4):1209-38. PubMed ID: 11658941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The legal status of the unborn after Webster. Parness JA Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway? Gallagher J Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway? Goldberg S Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):591-623. PubMed ID: 11649263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers. Dougherty CJ Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos. Goldberg S Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Criminal liability for substance abuse during pregnancy: the controversy of maternal v. fetal rights. Dobson T; Eby KK St Louis Univ Law J; 1992; 36(3):655-94. PubMed ID: 11659686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty. Johnsen D Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The constitutional morality of abortion. Brownstein A; Dau P Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medicolegal implications of constitutional status for the unborn: "ambulatory chalices" or "priorities and aspirations. Tolton C Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1988; 47(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 11655976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution. Dawson TB Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal rights and maternal rights: is there a conflict? Rogers S Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):456-69. PubMed ID: 11651100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Self-identification and the morality of abortion. Lusby K Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):121-58. PubMed ID: 11656258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis. Peterfy A J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion, personhood, and privacy in Texas. Johnson A Tex Law Rev; 1990 Jun; 68(7):1521-44. PubMed ID: 11656019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Va. debates law on fetal homicide: legislation entangled with abortion issue. Nakashima E Washington Post; 1996 Feb; ():D1, D5. PubMed ID: 11647497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]