These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659202)
21. Right to refuse psychotropic medication: an interdisciplinary proposal. Hickman FJ; Resnick PJ; Olson KB Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 11658306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The right to refuse treatment in Quebec. Morrison D Health Law Can; 1985; 5():65-8. PubMed ID: 11660312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Competency to consent. Saks ER North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 69(4):945-99. PubMed ID: 11659498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The right of involuntary patients in mental institutions to refuse drug treatment. Sidley NT J Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(2):231-55. PubMed ID: 11658580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Constitutional law--an involuntarily committed mental patient has a qualified right to make treatment decisions absent a formal adjudication of incompetence--Rogers v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health. White AB Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1984; 18(3):503-11. PubMed ID: 11658616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The right to refuse treatment. Perlin ML; Zusman J Advocacy Now; 1979 May; 1(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 11665031 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Ethical issues in inpatient practice. Sider RC Psychiatr Med Update Mass Gen Hosp Rev Physicians; 1986; 4(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 11659331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Albany debates plan to force treatment on the mentally ill. Hernandez R N Y Times Web; 1999 Jul; ():20. PubMed ID: 11648128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Rogers v. Okin. U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Fed Report; 1984 Jun; 738():1-9. PubMed ID: 11648487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. California consent decree gives right to refuse antipsychotic medication. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1983; 7(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 11658687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. In re Mental Commitment of M.P. Indiana. Court of Appeals, Second District North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Nov; 500():216-28. PubMed ID: 12041210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In re Schmidt. Minnesota. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1989 Jul; 443():824-30. PubMed ID: 12041163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Medicating committed psychiatric patients over their objections: balancing patients' interests and quality of mental health care. Hacker G Rutgers Law J; 1983; 14(3):685-739. PubMed ID: 11658759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values. Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. State ex rel. Jones v. Gerhardstein. Wisconsin. Supreme Court Wests North West Rep; 1987 Dec; 416():883-900. PubMed ID: 12041140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Righting a child's right to refuse medical treatment: Section 11 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and the Gillick competent child. Austin G Otago Law Rev; 1992; 7(4):578-96. PubMed ID: 11659776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making. Parry J Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Few mentally ill understand drugs. Herbert W Sci News; 1982 May; 121(20):324-5. PubMed ID: 11658282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Damage remedies and institutional reform: the right to refuse treatment. Furrow BR Law Med Health Care; 1982 Sep; 10(4):152-7. PubMed ID: 11643897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. In re Guardianship of Ingram. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 11644500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]