807 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659270)
21. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes.
Allen AL
Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Medical treatment for minor children: the roles of parents, the state, the child, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Crutchfield CF
Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 11651710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Constitutional law: minors' access to contraceptives--freed from future restraints?
Hoyt EE
Univ Fla Law Rev; 1977; 29(5):1019-29. PubMed ID: 11664911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A deceptive liberty: the Supreme Court, minors, and abortion.
Donnelly TP
Georgetown Univ Right to Life J; 1983; 3():15-22. PubMed ID: 11655594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. When is a pregnant minor mature? When is an abortion in her best interests? The Ohio Supreme Court applies Ohio's Abortion Parental Notification Law: In re Jane Doe 1.
Stuhlbarg SF
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1992; 60(3):907-61. PubMed ID: 11651633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The future of abortion.
McDaniel A
Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors.
Schmidt CG
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi.
Jackson CP
Temple Law Rev; 1994; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The role of families in medical decisions.
Minow M
Utah Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11659479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Abortion--an update.
Guthman HL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 11649201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy.
Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Justices deadlocked on state laws restricting minors' access to abortion.
Taylor S
N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():B16. PubMed ID: 11646635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Abortion: a new round.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The evolution of the right to privacy after Roe v. Wade.
Barnard D
Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2 3):365-525. PubMed ID: 11659051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Minors' right to abortion and contraception: prospects for invalidating less than absolute restrictions.
Klassel D; Lewin A
Womens Rights Law Report; 1978; 4(3):165-83. PubMed ID: 11665012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Right to abortion limited: the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of parental notification statutes.
Byrne TJ
Loyola Law Rev; 1982; 28(1):281-96. PubMed ID: 11658437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A minor's right to abortion -- the unconstitutionality of parental participation in bypass hearings.
Ehrlich JS; Sabino JA
New Engl Law Rev; 1991; 25(4):1185-209. PubMed ID: 11659404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Parental notification: a state-created obstacle to a minor woman's right of privacy.
Bush SA
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):579-603. PubMed ID: 11655618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The viability of the trimester approach.
Calder KA
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Restrictions on the abortion rights of minors: Bellotti v. Baird.
Harv Womens Law J; 1980; 3(1):119-39. PubMed ID: 11658352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
