BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659291)

  • 1. Sterilisation and the mentally handicapped.
    Cooney T
    Dubl Univ Law J; 1989; 11(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 11659291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Balancing the right of the mentally retarded to obtain a therapeutic sterilization against the potential for abuse.
    Irvine AC
    Law Psychol Rev; 1988; 12():95-122. PubMed ID: 11660733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voluntary sterilization for persons with mental disabilities: the need for legislation.
    Burnett BA
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1981; 32(4):913-55. PubMed ID: 11658516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sterilisation of mentally handicapped people: judges rule ok?
    Shaw J
    Mod Law Rev; 1990 Jan; 53(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 11659259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exclusive juvenile jurisdiction to authorize sterilization of incompetent minors.
    Bays-Beinart DJ
    Indiana Law Rev; 1983; 16(4):835-60. PubMed ID: 11658574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sterilization of mental defectives: compulsion and consent.
    Comer D
    Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):174-98. PubMed ID: 11660881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Involuntary sexual sterilization of incompetents in Alabama: past, present, and future.
    Larson EJ; Nelson LJ
    Ala Law Rev; 1992; 43(2):399-444. PubMed ID: 11659705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A case-based approach to sterilization of mentally incompetent women.
    Keown RM
    Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):94-113. PubMed ID: 11657344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual sterilization--constitutional validity of involuntary sterilization and consent determinative of voluntariness.
    Baker JD
    Miss Law Rev; 1975; 40(3):509-26. PubMed ID: 11664500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consent, coercion and consortium: the sexual politics of sterilisation.
    Kingdom E
    J Law Soc; 1985; 12(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 11658875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surrogate consent and the incompetent experimental subject.
    Bein PM
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1991 Sep; 46(5):739-71. PubMed ID: 11651381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproductive rights 1983: an international survey.
    Isaacs S
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1982-1983 Fall-Winter; 14(2):311-53. PubMed ID: 11658562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The right to consent and the right to refuse: more problems with minors and medical consent.
    Edwards L
    Jurid Rev; 1993 Jan; Part 1():52-73. PubMed ID: 11659661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The judicial portrayal of the physician in abortion and sterilization decisions: the use and abuse of medical discretion.
    Asaro A
    Harv Womens Law J; 1983; 6(1):51-102. PubMed ID: 11658431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Addressing the consent issue involved in the sterilization of mentally incompetent females.
    Davis DD
    Albany Law Rev; 1979; 43(2):322-38. PubMed ID: 11665120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sterilization in Pennsylvania.
    Beck PW; Soskis CW
    Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(2):213-36. PubMed ID: 11652406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Capacity, competence, consent: voluntary sterilization of the mentally retarded.
    Neuwirth GS; Heisler PA; Goldrich KS
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):447-72. PubMed ID: 11663600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comments on the sterilization of mental incompetents in Canadian civil and common law.
    Kouri RP; Somerville MA
    Rev Droit; 1980; 10(2):599-628. PubMed ID: 11651751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sterilization.
    Califano JA
    Forum (Wash); 1978; 2(2):7-13. PubMed ID: 11643514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compelled medical procedures involving minors and incompetents and misapplication of the substituted judgment doctrine.
    Lebit LE
    J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(1):107-30. PubMed ID: 11659623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.