BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659306)

  • 1. Utilitarian killing, replacement, and rights.
    Pluhar E
    J Agric Ethics; 1990; 3(2):147-71. PubMed ID: 11659306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On behalf of moderate speciesism.
    Holland AJ
    J Appl Philos; 1984 Oct; 1(2):281-91. PubMed ID: 11651783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Moral community and animal research in medicine.
    Frey RG
    Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(2):123-36. PubMed ID: 11655127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethical considerations in painful animal research.
    Fox MA
    Adv Pain Res Ther; 1985; 9():685-94. PubMed ID: 11659068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The moral status of animals and their use in research: a philosophical review.
    DeGrazia D
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1991 Mar; 1(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 11645700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tooley's immodest proposal: Abortion and Infanticide.
    Sommers CH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Jun; 15(3):39-42. PubMed ID: 11643787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion and victimisability.
    Winkler ER
    J Appl Philos; 1984 Oct; 1(2):305-18. PubMed ID: 11651784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why abortion is immoral.
    Marquis D
    J Philos; 1989 Apr; 86(4):183-202. PubMed ID: 11782094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rights, justice, and duties to provide assistance: a critique of Regan's theory of rights.
    Jamieson D
    Ethics; 1990 Jan; 100(2):349-62. PubMed ID: 11659234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bioethical troubles: animal individuals and human organisms.
    Donnelley S
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(7; Spec. Iss):21-9. PubMed ID: 11653193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Kantian argument against abortion.
    Gensler HJ
    Philos Stud; 1985 Jul; 48(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 11655889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opposing views on animal experimentation: do animals have rights?
    Beauchamp TL
    Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 11655126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What Is a Person? edited by Michael F. Goodman, and Moral Personhood: An Essay in the Philosophy of Moral Psychology by G.E. Scott.
    Elliot R
    Bioethics; 1992 Jan; 6(1):41-60. PubMed ID: 11651507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical issues of life and death: a review article.
    Rowntree S
    Thought; 1982 Dec; 57(227):449-64. PubMed ID: 11649634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The failure of theories of personhood.
    Beauchamp TL
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1999 Dec; 9(4):309-24. PubMed ID: 11657914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The moral significance of birth.
    Bermúdez JL
    Ethics; 1996 Jan; 106(2):378-403. PubMed ID: 11656645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Animal rights, human rights.
    Derr TS
    First Things; 1992 Feb; 20():23-30. PubMed ID: 11651486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective nontreatment and spina bifida: a case study in ethical theory and application.
    Johnson PR
    Bioethics Q; 1981; 3(2):91-111. PubMed ID: 11645467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. John T. Noonan and Baby Jane Doe.
    Levin DS
    Philos Context; 1984; 14():35-41. PubMed ID: 11651859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Engelhardt on the abortion and euthanasia of defective infants.
    Jones GE
    Linacre Q; 1983 May; 50(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 11653532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.