BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659324)

  • 1. Women and HIV/AIDS research: the barriers to equity.
    Levine C
    IRB; 1991; 13(1-2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11659324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protectionism and the new research imperative in pediatric AIDS.
    Ackerman TF
    IRB; 1990; 12(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11654001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective.
    Bagley G
    Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols.
    Gorenberg H; White A
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women in clinical trials: concluding remarks.
    Buc NL
    Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 11653146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exclusion of pregnant women from research protocols: unethical and illegal.
    Hall JK
    IRB; 1995; 17(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 11653053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Women's and fetal rights and interests: ethical aspects.
    Fletcher JC
    Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 11653145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The invisible woman: gender bias in medical research.
    Keville TD
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1994; 15():123-42. PubMed ID: 11660409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protection of human subjects.
    United States
    Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.
    Macklin R
    IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion politics, science, and research ethics: take down the wall of separation.
    Fletcher JC
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():95-121. PubMed ID: 11645741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult.
    Brodeur D
    Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shaking up the status quo: how AIDS activists have challenged drug development and approval procedures.
    Dunbar MM
    Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1991 Sep; 46(5):673-706. PubMed ID: 11651380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regulatory concerns regarding AIDS vaccine development.
    Sawyer LA; Katzenstein DA; Quinnan GV
    AIDS Public Policy J; 1988; 3(3):36-45. PubMed ID: 11650100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental drugs: more of them, but they're no longer free.
    Caplan J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):3. PubMed ID: 11644019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. There is no women's health crisis.
    Satel SL
    Public Interest; 1998; 130():21-33. PubMed ID: 11658109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protecting us to death: women, pregnancy, and clinical research trials.
    Charo RA
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):135-87. PubMed ID: 11656322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AIDS treatment drugs: clinical trials and compassionate use.
    Levine RJ
    AIDS Public Policy J; 1987; 2(2):6-8. PubMed ID: 11650031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Twice wrong on AIDS.
    Gieringer D
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Jan; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11646161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AIDS and drug pricing: in search of a policy.
    Salbu SR
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1993; 71(3):691-734. PubMed ID: 11652750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.