BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

835 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659333)

  • 1. Easing restrictions on minors' abortion rights.
    O'Keeffe J; Jones JM
    Issues Sci Technol; 1990; 7(4):74-80. PubMed ID: 11659333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future.
    Joseph MA
    New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
    Wardle LD
    Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
    Embree MG; Dobson TA
    Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
    Lozano GD
    St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power.
    Paul EW; Klassel D
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When is a pregnant minor mature? When is an abortion in her best interests? The Ohio Supreme Court applies Ohio's Abortion Parental Notification Law: In re Jane Doe 1.
    Stuhlbarg SF
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1992; 60(3):907-61. PubMed ID: 11651633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychological and legal issues in minors' rights to abortion.
    Pliner AJ; Yates S
    J Soc Issues; 1992; 48(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 11656503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unemancipated minors' rights of access to contraceptives without parental consent or notice--the squeal rule and beyond.
    Best M
    Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 1983; 8(2):219-50. PubMed ID: 11658756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions.
    Wolff MH; Hawn RH
    Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of state abortion restrictions on minors' demand for abortions.
    Haas-Wilson D
    J Hum Resour; 1996; 31(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 11660452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
    Frame DW
    West VA Law Rev; 1983; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy.
    Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parental notification and public policy.
    Diamond EF
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 11656615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
    Pirner RK; Williams LB
    Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
    Heller S
    Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi.
    Jackson CP
    Temple Law Rev; 1994; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
    Farber DA; Nowak JE
    Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The future of abortion.
    McDaniel A
    Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.