408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659370)
1. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
Farber DA; Nowak JE
Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
Pirner RK; Williams LB
Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion--an update.
Guthman HL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 11649201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
Lozano GD
St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
Heller S
Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
Kudner KE
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. When is a pregnant minor mature? When is an abortion in her best interests? The Ohio Supreme Court applies Ohio's Abortion Parental Notification Law: In re Jane Doe 1.
Stuhlbarg SF
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1992; 60(3):907-61. PubMed ID: 11651633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future.
Joseph MA
New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi.
Jackson CP
Temple Law Rev; 1994; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The future of abortion.
McDaniel A
Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
Sourial WH
Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts.
Chaput KA
Oregon Law Rev; 1991; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
Prall S
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The viability of the trimester approach.
Calder KA
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes.
Allen AL
Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion: a new round.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
Wardle LD
Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
Casurella JG; Schrock CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
Frame DW
West VA Law Rev; 1983; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Workability of the undue burden test.
Schneider EA
Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
