389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659375)
1. A comparative study of the law relating to the physician's duty to obtain the patient's "informed consent" to medical treatment in England and California.
Churchward AB
Conn J Int Law; 1990; 5(2):483-563. PubMed ID: 11659375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance?
Teff H
Law Q Rev; 1985 Jul; 101():432-53. PubMed ID: 11658726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The patient's right to know -- a comparative view.
Giesen D; Hayes J
Anglo Am Law Rev; 1992; 21(2):101-22. PubMed ID: 11659667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Consent, autonomy and the infantilised patient.
Robertshaw P; Thacker R
Med Law Int; 1993; 1(1):33-56. PubMed ID: 11659739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The meaning of informed consent.
Whitfield A
Med Leg J; 1986; 54(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 11653740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rogers v. Whitaker and informed consent in Australia: a fair dinkum duty of disclosure.
Chalmers D; Schwartz R
Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 11660490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent: a German lesson.
Shaw J
Int Comp Law Q; 1986 Oct; 35(4):864-90. PubMed ID: 11659183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent: the three tests and a modest proposal for the reality of the patient as an individual.
Trichter JG; Lewis PW
South Tex Law J; 1981; 21(2):155-70. PubMed ID: 11658706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond Bolam: responding to the patient.
Feenan DK
Med Law Int; 1994; 1(2):177-93. PubMed ID: 11653113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent for the man on the Clapham omnibus: an English cure for "the American disease".
Miller FH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):169-90. PubMed ID: 11649911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed refusal: an unnecessary burden on physicians?
Shank S
UMKC Law Rev; 1981; 49(3):365-76. PubMed ID: 11658619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical malpractice: informed consent cases in "full-disclosure" jurisdictions.
Seidelson DE
Duquesne Law Rev; 1976; 14(3):309-47. PubMed ID: 11664631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital.
Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Feb; [1984] 1():1018-36. PubMed ID: 11648155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Doctor's duty to inform patient of risk.
Times (Lond); 1984 Feb; ():24. PubMed ID: 11647764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why the British courts rejected the American doctrine of informed consent (and what British physicians should do about it).
Annas GJ
Am J Public Health; 1984 Nov; 74(11):1286-8. PubMed ID: 6496827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis.
Monks SS
Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. From informed consent to patient choice: a new protected interest.
Shultz MM
Yale Law J; 1985 Dec; 95(2):219-99. PubMed ID: 11658859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Consent to treatment--how informed is informed consent?
Brahams D
Med Leg J; 1984; 52(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 11658727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical decision-making: patient participation.
Wolfgarten A; Khan A
Med Leg J; 1984; 52(Pt. 3):180-90. PubMed ID: 11649586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Why Britain can't afford informed consent.
Schwartz R; Grubb A
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Aug; 15(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 4055351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
