202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659383)
1. Deciding the fate of frozen embryos.
Corns C
Law Inst J; 1990 Apr; 64(4):273-6. PubMed ID: 11659383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Davis v. Davis: what about future disputes?
Feliciano T
Conn Law Rev; 1993; 26(1):305-53. PubMed ID: 11660034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Allocation of decision-making rights to frozen embryos.
Poole EK
Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(1):67-102. PubMed ID: 11659329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes.
Muller RJ
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. My egg, your sperm, whose preembryo? A proposal for deciding which party receives custody of frozen preembryos.
Katz DA
Va J Soc Policy Law; 1998; 5(3):623-74. PubMed ID: 11979606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Guardianship and the IVF human embryo.
Kasimba P; Buckle S
Melb Univ Law Rev; 1989; 17():139-52. PubMed ID: 11659316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prior agreements for disposition of frozen embryos.
Robertson JA
Ohio State Law J; 1990; 51(2):407-24. PubMed ID: 11652816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate.
Langley DB
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
Sheinbach DM
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Frozen embryos: what are they and how should the law treat them?
Sublett MF
Clevel State Law Rev; 1990; 38(4):585-616. PubMed ID: 11659459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A time to be born, a time to die: alternative reproduction and Texas probate law.
Heard LD
St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):927-63. PubMed ID: 11652490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Tennessee judge awards custody of 7 frozen embryos to woman.
Smothers R
N Y Times Web; 1989 Sep; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11647867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Court gives ex-husband rights on use of embryos.
Smothers R
N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The ectogenetic human being: a problem child of our time.
Dickens BM
Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1979 Winter 1979-80; 18(1):241-67. PubMed ID: 11665167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution.
Trespalacios MJ
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 46(3):803-34. PubMed ID: 16047447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New turn in a couple's fight over embryos.
N Y Times Web; 1990 May; ():21. PubMed ID: 11646769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In the beginning: the legal status of early embryos.
Robertson JA
Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):437-517. PubMed ID: 11659369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Frozen embryos: a need for thawing in the legislative process.
Davidoff BE
SMU Law Rev; 1993; 47(1):131-64. PubMed ID: 11652686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Judge rules woman who provides eggs has right to decide embryos' fate.
N Y Times Web; 1995 Jan; ():B5. PubMed ID: 11647991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
