202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659383)
21. Kass v. Kass.
New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
Wests N Y Suppl; 1997 Sep; 663():581-602. PubMed ID: 12041117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vitro fertilization: perspectives on current issues.
Ephross JN
Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(3):447-72. PubMed ID: 11656221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Massachusetts case is latest to ask court to decide fate of frozen embryos.
Goldberg C
N Y Times Web; 1999 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11647732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Law for protection of embryos.
Germany
Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Guidelines for performing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET) as a method of treating human sterility.
German Medical Association. Federal Medical Board. Scientific Advisory Board
World Med J; 1986; 33(2-3):25-9. PubMed ID: 11659000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Reconceiving privacy: relationships and reproductive technology.
Rao R
UCLA Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 45(4):1077-123. PubMed ID: 11660817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Sign on the dotted line: enforceability of signed agreements, upon divorce of the married couple, concerning the disposition of their frozen preembryos.
Rosado M
New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(4):1041-75. PubMed ID: 15162814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Order No. 728 of 17 September 1997 on artificial fertilization.
Denmark
Int Dig Health Legis; 1998; 49(3):489-91. PubMed ID: 11657538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Artificial insemination and in vitro fertilization.
Keyserlingk EW
Bioethics Q; 1981; 3(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 11645461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Resolving disputes over frozen embryos.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(6):7-12. PubMed ID: 2606667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Determination of legal parentage in egg donation, embryo transplantation, and gestational surrogacy arrangements.
Goodwin A
Fam Law Q; 1992; 26(3):275-91. PubMed ID: 11659602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Techniques of Assisted Reproduction: Act 35/1988.
Spain
Bol Of Estado Gac Madr Spain; 1988 Nov; No. 282():. PubMed ID: 12041504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The parent trap: uncovering the myth of "coerced parenthood" in frozen embryo disputes.
Waldman E
Am Univ Law Rev; 2004 Jun; 53(5):1021-62. PubMed ID: 15529471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Excess embryos: is embryo adoption a new solution or a temporary fix?
Johnson ND
Brooklyn Law Rev; 2003; 68(3):853-83. PubMed ID: 15237519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cryopreserved embryos: who shall decide their fate?
Perry C; Schneider LK
J Leg Med; 1992 Dec; 13(4):463-500. PubMed ID: 1469329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. In Britain and Australia, new in vitro guidelines.
Levine C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Feb; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 11643983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. What does it mean to be a "parent"? The claims of biology as the basis for parental rights.
Hill JL
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 May; 66(2):353-420. PubMed ID: 11659546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Hecht v. Superior Court: recognizing a property right in reproductive material.
Collins JL
Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1994-1995 Summer; 33(3):661-84. PubMed ID: 11660116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Draft ABA Model Surrogacy Act.
American Bar Association. Section of Family Law, Adoption Committee, and Ad Hoc Surrogacy Committee
Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):123-43. PubMed ID: 11659040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Man-made man and the law.
Tuchler DJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1978; 22(2):310-25. PubMed ID: 11664955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
