684 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659394)
1. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
Parness JA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life.
Parness JA; Pritchard SK
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
Rush SE
Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins.
Crepps J; Miller A
Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
Buckley M
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
Rubenfeld J
Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection.
Johnsen DE
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
Dorczak A
Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):133-56. PubMed ID: 11656494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The fetus under Section 1983: still struggling for recognition.
Czepiga PT
Syracuse Law Rev; 1983; 34(4):1029-65. PubMed ID: 11655745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The legal status of the embryo.
Andrews LB
Loyola Law Rev; 1986; 32(2):357-409. PubMed ID: 11658916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases.
Klasing MS
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1995; 22(3):933-79. PubMed ID: 11660413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
Minter CV
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
Martyn K
UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reexamining Roe: nineteenth-century abortion statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Witherspoon JS
St Marys Law J; 1985; 17(1):29-71. PubMed ID: 11655872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Live birth: a condition precedent to recognition of rights.
Crockett KG; Hyman M
Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):805-36. PubMed ID: 11664599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal rights? It depends.
Doudera AE
Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):38-44, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11649512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
Chemerinsky E
Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
