285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659420)
1. Compelled hospitalization and treatment during pregnancy: mental health statutes as models for legislation to protect children from prenatal drug and alcohol exposure.
Wilton JM
Fam Law Q; 1991; 25(2):149-70. PubMed ID: 11659420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. "For their own good": civil commitment of alcohol and drug-dependent pregnant women.
Chavkin DF
S D Law Rev; 1992; 37(2):224-88. PubMed ID: 11657122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pregnant substance abusers: a problem that won't go away.
Swenson VJ; Crabbe C
St Marys Law J; 1994; 25(2):623-73. PubMed ID: 11652732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A limited role for the legal system in responding to maternal substance abuse during pregnancy.
Myers JE
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1991; 5(3):747-81. PubMed ID: 11651057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prosecution of mothers of drug-exposed babies: constitutional and criminal theory.
McGinnis DM
Univ PA Law Rev; 1990 Dec; 139(2):505-39. PubMed ID: 11651407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right of the fetus to be born free of drug addiction.
Levine M
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():45-55. PubMed ID: 11661109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mental health--the right to refuse drug therapy under "emergency restraint statutes".
McGovern JJ
New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):509-40. PubMed ID: 11664602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A delicate condition.
Andrews LB
Stud Lawyer; 1985 May; 13(9):30-6. PubMed ID: 11649782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How far can a state go to protect a fetus? The Rebecca Corneau story and the case for requiring Massachusetts to follow the U.S. Constitution.
Bower HR
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2001; 31(1):123-54. PubMed ID: 12666688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Court-ordered prenatal intervention: a final means to the end of gestational substance abuse.
Flannery MT
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(3):519-604. PubMed ID: 11659750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal issues: drug testing of postpartum women and newborns as the basis for civil and criminal proceedings.
Moss KL
Clgh Rev; 1990 Mar; 23(11):1406-14. PubMed ID: 11659232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Mental health law and the movement toward voluntary treatment.
Wexler DB
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):671-92. PubMed ID: 11663460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pregnant women in chains?
Mathieu D
Politics Life Sci; 1996 Mar; 15(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 11655026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies.
Sangree S
Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Norplant condition: protecting the unborn or violating fundamental rights?
Persels J
J Leg Med; 1992 Jun; 13(2):237-62. PubMed ID: 11643010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sex, drugs, pregnancy, and the law: rethinking the problems of pregnant women who use drugs.
Oberman M
Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):505-48. PubMed ID: 11652105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal rights and the prosecution of women for using drugs during pregnancy.
Janssen ND
Drake Law Rev; 2000; 48(4):741-68. PubMed ID: 12449973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Crack babies and the Constitution: ruminations about addicted pregnant women after Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
Marrus E
Villanova Law Rev; 2002; 47(2):299-340. PubMed ID: 12680368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Respecting liberty and preventing harm: limits of state intervention in prenatal choice.
Mathieu D
Harv J Law Public Policy; 1985; 8(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 11655781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
