These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
684 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659422)
21. The future of Baby Doe. Singer P; Kuhse H New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Baby Jane Doe: the ethical issues. Conley JJ America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):84-9. PubMed ID: 11658402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Medical ethics in life and death. Thompson R Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns. Fost N Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 11644122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives. Ciulla JB Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Baby Doe cases: compromise and moral dilemma. Haddon PA Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):545-615. PubMed ID: 11658790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases. Bopp J; Coleson RE Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Severely disabled newborns: to live or let die? Jackson CC J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):135-76. PubMed ID: 11644153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Premature infants: a legal approach to decision-making in neonatal intensive care. Gorski SL Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1985; 19(3-4):261-81. PubMed ID: 11649774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Of diagnoses and discrimination: discriminatory nontreatment of infants with HIV infection. Crossley MA Columbia Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 93(7):1581-667. PubMed ID: 11659791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe. McFadden JP; Hentoff N Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A critique of Louisiana's approach to withholding medical treatment from defective newborns. Goichman G South Univ Law Rev; 1983; 9(2):157-84. PubMed ID: 11652508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases. Riga PJ Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Privacy and the right to die. Riga PJ Cathol Lawyer; 1981; 26(2):89-126. PubMed ID: 11651685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Recent developments in the law governing medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities. National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled Clgh Rev; 1988 May; 22(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 11652540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1985 developments. National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):257-78. PubMed ID: 11651813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade. Rhoden NK Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn. Portela C Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]