255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659426)
1. Prohibiting amniocentesis in India: a solution to the problem of female infanticide or a problem to the solution of prenatal diagnosis?
Gorman-Stapleton O
ILSA J Int Law; 1990; 14():23-43. PubMed ID: 11659426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Benign sex discrimination revisited: constitutional and moral issues in banning sex-selection abortion.
Schedler G
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1988; 15(3):295-343. PubMed ID: 11659237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex-determination and sex preselection tests in India: recent techniques in femicide.
Patel V
Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 11659298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. State in India bars fetus-sex testing.
Weisman SR
N Y Times Web; 1988 Jul; ():A1, A9. PubMed ID: 11647852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sex-detection tests and female foeticide: discrimination before birth.
Lingam L
Indian J Soc Work; 1991 Jan; 52(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11659540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New reproductive technologies in India: a print media analysis.
Lingam L
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 11649278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. India fights abortion of female fetuses.
Burns JF
N Y Times Web; 1994 Aug; ():5. PubMed ID: 11647980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion and the law: questions for feminism.
Menon N
Can J Women Law; 1993; 6(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 11659745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. India to ban prenatal sex determination.
Nandan G
BMJ; 1993 Feb; 306(6874):353. PubMed ID: 11643101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Sex selective eugenic abortion: prospects in China and India.
Moen E
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):231-49. PubMed ID: 11651218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sex selection and reproductive freedom.
Renteln AD
Womens Stud Int Forum; 1992; 15(3):405-26. PubMed ID: 11659708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. India makes sure of baby boys.
New Sci; 1986 Dec 25-1987 Jan 1; 112(1540-1541):8. PubMed ID: 11658773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace.
Buss E
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Birth technologies: prenatal diagnosis and abortion policy.
Brigham J; Rifkin J; Solt CG
Politics Life Sci; 1993 Feb; 12(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 11656399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sex selection abortion: a constitutional analysis of the abortion liberty and a person's right to know.
Schaibley JR
Indiana Law J; 1981; 56(2):281-319. PubMed ID: 11658353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Women and abortion.
Jesani A; Iyer A
Econ Polit Wkly; 1993 Nov; 28(48):2591-4. PubMed ID: 11656491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of pre-natal diagnostic techniques for sex selection: the Indian scene.
Kusum
Bioethics; 1993 Apr; 7(2-3):149-65. PubMed ID: 11651528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Amniocentesis debate continued.
Dube L
Econ Polit Wkly; 1983 Sep; 18(38):1633-5. PubMed ID: 11649196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic screening and counseling: the legal and ethical issues.
Waltz JR; Thigpen CR
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(4):696-768. PubMed ID: 11662927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Decreasing sex ratio and pregnant women's attitude towards female foeticide.
Sarna K
Nurs J India; 2005 Apr; 96(4):83-4. PubMed ID: 16173437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]