These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659426)

  • 41. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes.
    Allen AL
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The landmark abortion decisions: justifiable termination or miscarriage of justice?--proposals for legislative response.
    Scotland AG
    Pac Law J; 1973 Jul; 4(2):821-60. PubMed ID: 11663368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The ethics of gender justice.
    Patel V
    Med Ethics; 1995; 3(4):65-7. PubMed ID: 15586949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Mother matters: a fresh look at prenatal genetic testing.
    Lippman A
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 11653996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Should one be free to choose the sex of one's child?
    Kumar D
    J Appl Philos; 1985; 2(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 11655786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered?
    Lieber KB
    Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Should parents be prohibited from choosing the sex of their child?
    Steinbacher R; Ericsson R
    Health (N Y); 1994; 8(2):24. PubMed ID: 11659752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Choosing the sexual orientation of children.
    Stein E
    Bioethics; 1998 Jan; 12(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11655306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Technology and motherhood: reproductive choice reconsidered.
    Rowland R
    Signs (Chic); 1987; 12(3):512-28. PubMed ID: 11658924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Amendment No. 336.
    Bartlett DF
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A genetic "steam engine".
    Etzioni A
    J Curr Soc Issues; 1975; 12(4):26-30. PubMed ID: 11661247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Abortion and the law in 1980.
    Paul EW; Schaap P
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(3):497-525. PubMed ID: 11664083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Neutrality in constitutional law (with special reference to pornography, abortion, and surrogacy).
    Sunstein CR
    Columbia Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 92(1):1-52. PubMed ID: 11658112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Legal implications of amniocentesis.
    Friedman JM
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1974 Nov; 123(1):92-156. PubMed ID: 11664320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Against selection of human life -- people with disabilities oppose genetic counselling.
    Waldschmidt A
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 11653997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Can technology solve the abortion dilemma?
    Maguire MR
    Christ Century; 1976 Oct; 93(34):918-9. PubMed ID: 11663690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols.
    Gorenberg H; White A
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Using technology, choosing sex. The campaign against sex determination and the question of choice.
    Forum Against Sex Determination and Sex Pre-Selection
    Dev Dialogue; 1992; (1-2):91-102. PubMed ID: 12286888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Abortion in Japan: a feminist critique.
    Maruyama H
    Wis Womens Law J; 1995; 10():131-60. PubMed ID: 11660313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Sexism and "the superfluous female": arguments for regulating pre-implantation sex selection.
    Danis J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1995; 18():219-64. PubMed ID: 11660528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.