These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659440)
1. Artificial insemination by donor: information, communication and regulation. Gibson EL J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 11659440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A medical advancement in search of a legal theory--artificial insemination by donor and the law. Baylson MM Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1987 Feb; 5(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11658912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidentiality and American semen donors. Karow AM Int J Fertil; 1993; 38(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 11659706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The judicial aspects of artificial insemination. Strasberg-Cohen T Med Law; 1982 Jun; 1(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 11649658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Frustrated intentions and binding biology: seeking AID (Artificial Insemination by Donor) in the law. Schiff AR Duke Law J; 1994 Dec; 44(3):524-70. PubMed ID: 11660686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law. Wadlington W Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. DI or DIY (Do It Yourself)? Missing elements in the donor insemination secrecy/openness debate. Burfoot A Politics Life Sci; 1993 Aug; 12(2):174-6. PubMed ID: 11654708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Austria: a legal ban on surrogate mothers and fathers? Bernat E; Straka U J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Spring; 31(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 11660068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Conceiving for cash; is it legal?: a survey of the laws applicable to surrogate motherhood. Taylor S N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1987; 4(Part 2):413-44. PubMed ID: 11650203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The status of artificially procreated children: international disparities. Delaisi de Parseval G; Fagot-Largeault A Bioethics; 1988 Apr; 2(2):136-50. PubMed ID: 11650054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificial insemination and the law. Jensen BJ Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(4):935-90. PubMed ID: 11658495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Daniels KR; Taylor K Politics Life Sci; 1993 Aug; 12(2):155-70. PubMed ID: 11654705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Infertility and sterility: legal implications of artificial conception. Palm MT; Hirsh HL Med Law; 1982 Jun; 1(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 11649656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulating confidentiality of surrogacy records: lessons from the adoption experience. Smith P J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Winter; 31(1):65-103. PubMed ID: 11656450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-sex families: the impact of birth innovations upon traditional family notions. Shapiro ED; Schultz L J Fam Law; 1985-1986; 24(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 11659130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Great expectations or convoluted realities: artificial insemination in flux. Smith GP Fam Law Rev; 1980; 3():37-44. PubMed ID: 11658615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Finding fathers: artificial insemination, lesbians, and the law. Arnup K Can J Women Law; 1994; 7(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11660009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered? Lieber KB Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]