These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659440)
21. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice. Schenker JG; Frenkel DA Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The "legitimization" of artificial insemination: promise or problem? Knoppers BM Fam Law Rev; 1978 Apr; 1(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 11664957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Whose child is it anyway? Platt EF Med Leg J; 1994; 62 ( Pt 4)():180-97. PubMed ID: 7845312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Artificial insemination of human beings. Council of Europe Med Law; 1982 Jun; 1(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Artificial insemination: problems, policies, and proposals. Carr JE Ala Law Rev; 1973; 26(1):120-62. PubMed ID: 11664270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Restricting surrogacy to married couples: a constitutional problem? The married-parent requirement in the Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act. Massie AM Hastings Constit Law Q; 1991; 18(3):487-540. PubMed ID: 11651494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act. ; Fam Law Rep (Wash D C); 1989 Feb; 15(16):2009-16. PubMed ID: 11659181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Surrogate mother agreements: contemporary legal aspects of a biblical notion. Townsend MD Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1982; 16(2):467-83. PubMed ID: 11658708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Artificial conception: legislative approaches. Krause HD Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Civil law regulation of reproductive technologies: new laws for the new biology? Bercovitch J Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):385-406. PubMed ID: 11651095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Surrogacy: giving it an understood name. Morgan D J Soc Welfare Law; 1988; 4():216-39. PubMed ID: 11649264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: fertile areas for litigation. Lorio KV Southwest Law J; 1982 Feb; 35(5):973-1011. PubMed ID: 11658618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges. Capron AM Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A legal perspective on artificial insemination. Castillo DG Philipp Law J; 1976; 51(1-2):142-63. PubMed ID: 11664986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The surrogate mother--a growing problem. Sappideen C Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):79-102. PubMed ID: 11649732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Normative regulation of reproductive technologies in Israel. Shapira A Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):609-24. PubMed ID: 11650355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Draft ABA Model Surrogacy Act. American Bar Association. Section of Family Law, Adoption Committee, and Ad Hoc Surrogacy Committee Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):123-43. PubMed ID: 11659040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Babies in limbo: law outpaced by fertility advances. Weiss R Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Moving towards openness in donor insemination: variations on a theme. Daniels KR Politics Life Sci; 1993 Aug; 12(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 11654722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]