406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659489)
1. Prenatal and postnatal rights of incarcerated mothers.
Norz F
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1989; 20(2):S:55-73. PubMed ID: 11659489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice.
Feaver PD; Kling R; Plofchan TK
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1992-1993 Winter; 4():211-20. PubMed ID: 11652652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion: state action.
Womens Rights Law Report; 1977; 3(3-4):162-9. PubMed ID: 11663757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reasoning from the body: a historical perspective on abortion regulation and questions of equal protection.
Siegel R
Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 44(2):261-381. PubMed ID: 11656213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The second victory of Anthony Comstock?
Polenberg R
Society; 1982; 19(4):32-8. PubMed ID: 11650596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Equality of rights under the law: state constitutional protection for abortion rights in Maryland and beyond.
Forman S
Wis Womens Law J; 1991; 6():87-117. PubMed ID: 11656290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
Maltz EM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Kassop N
PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. House Joint Resolution 372: the Human Life Federalism Amendment.
Ashbrook JM
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Dec; 127(185):H9407-9. PubMed ID: 11652376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
Appleton SF
Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Live birth: a condition precedent to recognition of rights.
Crockett KG; Hyman M
Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):805-36. PubMed ID: 11664599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Whose egg is it anyway?: reproductive rights of incarcerated, institutionalized and incompetent women.
Stefan S
Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):405-56. PubMed ID: 11650349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes.
Allen AL
Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent and abortion.
Kapp MB
Wis L Rev; 1993; 1993(2):619-23. PubMed ID: 11659680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person.
Andrade VM
Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal trends in bioethics.
Fry-Revere S
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 11642833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The practice/theory dilemma: personal reflections on the Louisiana abortion case.
Colker R
Hastings Law J; 1992 Apr; 43(4):1195-257. PubMed ID: 11656210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
Heller S
Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies.
Sangree S
Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. E.R.A. and abortion: really separate issues?
Johnson D; Cunningham PC
America (NY); 1984 Jun; 150(22):432-7. PubMed ID: 11658432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
