276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659492)
1. Justice and care: mental disability and sterilization decisions.
Peppin P
Can Hum Rights Yearb; 1989-1990; 6():65-112. PubMed ID: 11659492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Guardianship of Eberhardy: the sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Derouin J
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1199-227. PubMed ID: 11651835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sterilization of mentally retarded persons: reproductive rights and family privacy.
Scott ES
Duke Law J; 1986 Nov; 1986(5):806-65. PubMed ID: 11658848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Involuntary sterilization of mentally disabled women.
Cepko R
Berkeley Womens Law J; 1993; 8():122-65. PubMed ID: 11659702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sterilization technology and decisionmaking: rethinking the incompetent's rights.
Cinelli GM; Nunnenkamp KJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():275-304. PubMed ID: 11645587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Eve decision -- a common law perspective.
Keyserlingk EW
Rev Gen Droit; 1987; 18(3):657-75. PubMed ID: 11659379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sterilisation and the courts.
Grubb A; Pearl D
Camb Law J; 1987 Nov; 46(3):439-64. PubMed ID: 11659062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sterilization of the mentally retarded adult: the Eve case.
Starkman B
McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):931-50. PubMed ID: 11650594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comments on the sterilization of mental incompetents in Canadian civil and common law.
Kouri RP; Somerville MA
Rev Droit; 1980; 10(2):599-628. PubMed ID: 11651751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Modern judicial treatment of procreative rights of developmentally disabled persons: equal rights to procreation and sterilization.
Jaegers EM
J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Fall; 31(4):947-79. PubMed ID: 11660196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Exclusive juvenile jurisdiction to authorize sterilization of incompetent minors.
Bays-Beinart DJ
Indiana Law Rev; 1983; 16(4):835-60. PubMed ID: 11658574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Re Eve.
Canada. Supreme Court
Dom Law Rep; 1986 Oct; 31():1-37. PubMed ID: 12041087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients.
Dresser R
Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The sterilization rights of mental retardates.
Munro AB
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1982; 39(1):207-21. PubMed ID: 11658661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family.
Baron CH
Fam Law Q; 1983; 17(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 11658459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Debra B.: the best interest standard in court-authorized sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Donahue SM
Maine Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):209-32. PubMed ID: 11652532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sterilization case has become fight over rights of retarded.
Goldberg D
Washington Post; 1994 Nov; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A case-based approach to sterilization of mentally incompetent women.
Keown RM
Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):94-113. PubMed ID: 11657344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sterilisation and mental handicap: sapping the strength of the state?
Lee R; Morgan D
J Law Soc; 1988; 15(3):229-46. PubMed ID: 11659063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar.
Williams SE
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
