275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659492)
21. Canada's Roe: the Canadian abortion decision and its implications for American constitutional law and theory.
Conkle DO
Const Comment; 1989; 6(2):299-318. PubMed ID: 11655992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The judicial portrayal of the physician in abortion and sterilization decisions: the use and abuse of medical discretion.
Asaro A
Harv Womens Law J; 1983; 6(1):51-102. PubMed ID: 11658431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Virginia's sterilization law: what should be done about it?
Hall SC
Va Bar News; 1980 Apr; 28(10):17-21. PubMed ID: 11658468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Matter of Moe.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
North East Rep Second Ser; 1982 Mar; 432():712-24. PubMed ID: 12041253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Abortion and democracy for women: a critique of Tremblay v. Daigle.
Greschner D
McGill Law J; 1990 Sep; 35(3):633-69. PubMed ID: 11656074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
Buchanan AE
UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
Rubin BL
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Specific intent, substituted judgment and best interests: a nationwide analysis of an individual's right to die.
Delaney JJ
Pace Law Rev; 1991; 11(3):565-641. PubMed ID: 11651454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Capacity, competence, consent: voluntary sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Neuwirth GS; Heisler PA; Goldrich KS
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):447-72. PubMed ID: 11663600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Sterilisation of mentally handicapped people: judges rule ok?
Shaw J
Mod Law Rev; 1990 Jan; 53(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 11659259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The Morgentaler decision: Parliament's options.
Hovius B
Can Fam Law Q; 1988; 3():137-65. PubMed ID: 11659378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. In re Guardianship of Matejski.
Iowa. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1988 Feb; 419():576-82. PubMed ID: 12041141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The Morgentaler judgment: constitutional rights, legislative intention, and institutional design.
Weinrib LE
Univ Tor Law J; 1992; 42(1):22-76. PubMed ID: 11656266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. In re Grady--voluntary sterilization and the retarded.
Denkin JF
Rutgers Law Rev; 1982; 34(3):567-90. PubMed ID: 11658757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
King P
J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Decisions by and for people with mental retardation: balancing considerations of autonomy and protection.
Ellis JW
Villanova Law Rev; 1992; 37(6):1779-809. PubMed ID: 11654415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Falling off the vine: legal fictions and the doctrine of substituted judgment.
Harmon L
Yale Law J; 1990 Oct; 100(1):1-71. PubMed ID: 11659389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. "Two steps forward, one step back": an analysis of New Jersey's latest "right-to-die" decisions.
Moore NJ
Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):955-98. PubMed ID: 11650182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Liberty, abortion, and constitutional review in Canada.
Marshall G
Public Law; 1988; ():199-211. PubMed ID: 11655934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
