These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659498)
1. Competency to consent. Saks ER North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 69(4):945-99. PubMed ID: 11659498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Guardianship of Ingram. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 11644500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Dresser R Rutgers Law Rev; 1994; 46(2):609-719. PubMed ID: 11660406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Making kids take their medicine: the privacy and due process rights of de facto competent minors. Costello JC Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 31(3):907-27. PubMed ID: 11660787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions. Brooks WM Touro Law Rev; 1991; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative. Rubin BL Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent and the voluntary psychiatric patient. Mrazek ML Leg Med Q; 1996; 20(Pt.4):13-20. PubMed ID: 11660714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Children's competence to provide informed consent for mental health treatment. Redding RE Wash Lee Law Rev; 1993; 50(2):695-753. PubMed ID: 11656328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values. Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications. Knepper K Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs. Hahn WA Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada. Winick BJ William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Autonomy for vulnerable populations: the Supreme Court's reckless disregard for self-determination and social science. Bersoff DN Villanova Law Rev; 1992; 37(6):1569-605. PubMed ID: 11654411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Public psychiatry and the right to refuse treatment: toward an effective damage remedy. Furrow BR Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1984; 19(1):21-60. PubMed ID: 11658667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents. Buchanan AE UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical, ethical and legal considerations of electroconvulsive therapy. MacDonald RP Osgoode Hall Law J; 1984; 22(4):683-710. PubMed ID: 11658852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]