These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Consent to clinical decisions when capacity is absent. Part 1: Making decisions. Nazarko L Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2004 Mar; 10(10):18-22. PubMed ID: 15038301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The living will--death with dignity or mechanical vitality. Wilson PH Cumberland Law Rev; 1979; 10(1):163-207. PubMed ID: 11661825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Children's rights: removing the parental consent barrier to medical treatment of minors. Wilkins LP Ariz State Law J; 1975; 1975(1):31-92. PubMed ID: 11664511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The appointment of medical treatment attorneys: some lessons from Australia. Woollard S Med Law Rev; 1998; 6(3):297-321. PubMed ID: 11658020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Life and death choice splits a family. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1996 Jan; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Health care power of attorney and combined advance directive legislation (as of January 1, 1997). Sabatino C Bioeth Bull; 1997; 5(3):14-22. PubMed ID: 11865905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy. Long SL; Ravenscraft P Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Informed and substitute consent to health care procedures: a proposal for state legislation. Gauvey SK Harvard J Legis; 1978 Apr; 15(3):431-96. PubMed ID: 11662618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements violate right to privacy in abortion decision. Sanders JE Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 24(2):446-62. PubMed ID: 11664628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Joseph MA New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Consent to medical care of minors: who has authority in Texas? Farrell HC Texas Bar J; 1979 Jan; 42(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 11664115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Implications of impaired executive control functions for patient autonomy and surrogate decision making. McCullough LB; Molinari V; Workman RH J Clin Ethics; 2001; 12(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 12026746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The minor's right to consent to medical treatment: a corollary of the constitutional right of privacy. Raitt GE South Calif Law Rev; 1975 Jun; 48(6):1417-56. PubMed ID: 11664463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Roe v. Wade: what rights the biological father? Georgius EH Hastings Constit Law Q; 1974; 1(1):251-72. PubMed ID: 11664368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medical surrogacy mediation: expanding patient, family, and physician rights and reformulating the Virginia Health Care Decisions Act. Moore DJ Va J Soc Policy Law; 2003; 10(3):410-44. PubMed ID: 15744904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Liability issues arising out of hospitals' and organ procurement organizations' rejection of valid anatomical gifts: the truth and consequences. Jardine DG Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(6):1655-94. PubMed ID: 11659458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]