These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659551)

  • 1. Toward guidelines for compelling cesarean surgery: of rights, responsibility, and decisional authenticity.
    Finer JJ
    Minn Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 76(2):239-94. PubMed ID: 11659551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means?
    Drigotas EE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
    Levine EM
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resisting the temptation to turn medical recommendations into judicial orders: a reconsideration of court-ordered surgery for pregnant women.
    Scott C
    Ga State Univ Law Rev; 1994 May; 10(4):615-89. PubMed ID: 11656420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planning on a miracle: the case of mother versus fetus.
    Paris JJ
    Christ Century; 1994 Mar; 111(8):244-5. PubMed ID: 11659999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New medical technology: a chance to reexamine court-ordered medical procedures during pregnancy.
    Ouellette A
    Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):927-60. PubMed ID: 11652868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mother v. her unborn child: where should Texas draw the line?
    Locke NJ
    Houst Law Rev; 1987 May; 24(3):549-76. PubMed ID: 11649225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Court-ordered surgery for the protection of a viable fetus: Jefferson v. Griffin Spalding County Hospital Authority, 247 Ga. 86, 274 S.E.2d 457 (1981).
    Manner RL
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1982; 5(1):125-48. PubMed ID: 11649638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
    Gallagher J
    Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
    Rhoden NK
    Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
    Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting.
    Sturgess RH
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):649-69. PubMed ID: 11650356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women.
    Daniels JA
    Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defining the boundaries of personal privacy: is there a paternal interest in compelling therapeutic fetal surgery?
    Blickenstaff DC
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1994; 88(3):1157-99. PubMed ID: 11656414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The maternal abdominal wall: a fortress against fetal health care?
    Phelan JP
    South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):461-90. PubMed ID: 11645842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
    Martin S; Coleman M
    McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Furthering the inquiry: race, class, and culture in the forced medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Ikemoto LC
    Tenn Law Rev; 1992; 59(3):487-517. PubMed ID: 11652636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway?
    Goldberg S
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):591-623. PubMed ID: 11649263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compulsory treatment of pregnant women.
    Nelson LJ
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 May; 1(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.