273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659574)
21. In a different voice: relational feminism, abortion rights, and the feminist legal agenda.
Karlan PS; Ortiz DR
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 87(3):858-96. PubMed ID: 11656396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The human preembryo, the progenitors, and the state: toward a dynamic theory of status, rights, and research policy.
Martin PA; Lagod ML
High Technol Law J; 1990; 5(2):257-310. PubMed ID: 11659412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
Rhoden NK
Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Abortion rights in America.
Bullock JR
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Human experimentation. Protecting patient autonomy through informed consent.
Tuthill KA
J Leg Med; 1997 Jun; 18(2):221-50. PubMed ID: 9230568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Protecting us to death: women, pregnancy, and clinical research trials.
Charo RA
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):135-87. PubMed ID: 11656322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Legal and ethical concepts involved in informed consent to human research.
Woody KJ
Calif West Law Rev; 1981; 18(1):50-79. PubMed ID: 11658328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The ethics of research in mental illness.
Ghaemi SN; Hundert EM
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 11653322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. An ethical evaluation of federal norms for fetal experimentation.
O'Rourke KD
Linacre Q; 1976 Feb; 43(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11663671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. An ethically based standard of care for fetal therapy.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
J Matern Fetal Investig; 1991; 1():175-80. PubMed ID: 11659969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Standards of accountability for consent in research.
Rubenstein LS
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):197-206. PubMed ID: 11654515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A womb of my own: a moral evaluation of Ohio's treatment of pregnant patients with living wills.
Lederman AD
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1994; 45(1):351-77. PubMed ID: 11656507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Deception in social research I: kinds of deception and the wrongs they may involve.
Sieber JE
IRB; 1982 Nov; 4(9):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. International research: ethical imperialism or ethical pluralism?
Macklin R
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):59-83. PubMed ID: 11657563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Abortion, ethics, and the common good: Who are we? What do we want? How do we get there?
Araujo RJ
Marquette Law Rev; 1993; 76():701-54. PubMed ID: 11659963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion to obtain fetal tissue for transplant.
Robertson JA
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1359-89. PubMed ID: 11657042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Casey in the mirror: abortion, abuse and the right to protection in the United States and Germany.
Neuman GL
Am J Comp Law; 1995; 43(2):273-314. PubMed ID: 11656594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Fetal tissue transplants: restricting recipient designation.
Danis MW
Hastings Law J; 1988 Jul; 39(5):1079-107. PubMed ID: 11659060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Gender matters: implications for clinical research and women's health care.
Rothenberg KH
Houst Law Rev; 1996 Symposium; 32(5):1201-72. PubMed ID: 11660524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The regulation of fetal tissue transplantation.
Morgan G
Univ N S W Law J; 1991; 14(2):283-301. PubMed ID: 11659513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
