290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11659575)
21. The sterilization rights of mental retardates.
Munro AB
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1982; 39(1):207-21. PubMed ID: 11658661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. In re Guardianship of Eberhardy: the sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Derouin J
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1199-227. PubMed ID: 11651835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Sterilization of mental defectives: compulsion and consent.
Comer D
Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):174-98. PubMed ID: 11660881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Nonconsensual sterilization of the mentally retarded--analysis of standards for judicial determinations.
Calibey KA
West New Engl Law Rev; 1981; 3(4):689-714. PubMed ID: 11658439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Sterilisation of mentally handicapped adults.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1988 Dec; 297(6662):1494. PubMed ID: 11644359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Justice and care: mental disability and sterilization decisions.
Peppin P
Can Hum Rights Yearb; 1989-1990; 6():65-112. PubMed ID: 11659492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Sterilization case has become fight over rights of retarded.
Goldberg D
Washington Post; 1994 Nov; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Exclusive juvenile jurisdiction to authorize sterilization of incompetent minors.
Bays-Beinart DJ
Indiana Law Rev; 1983; 16(4):835-60. PubMed ID: 11658574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Modern judicial treatment of procreative rights of developmentally disabled persons: equal rights to procreation and sterilization.
Jaegers EM
J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Fall; 31(4):947-79. PubMed ID: 11660196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Involuntary sexual sterilization of incompetents in Alabama: past, present, and future.
Larson EJ; Nelson LJ
Ala Law Rev; 1992; 43(2):399-444. PubMed ID: 11659705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Coercive sterilisation.
Lancet; 1989 Feb; 1(8632):288. PubMed ID: 11644427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Sterilising the intellectually disabled: the approach of the High Court of Australia in Department of Health v. J.W.B. and S.M.B.
Cica N
Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):186-231. PubMed ID: 11660492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Sexual sterilization--constitutional validity of involuntary sterilization and consent determinative of voluntariness.
Baker JD
Miss Law Rev; 1975; 40(3):509-26. PubMed ID: 11664500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The Eve decision -- a common law perspective.
Keyserlingk EW
Rev Gen Droit; 1987; 18(3):657-75. PubMed ID: 11659379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Sterilization, retardation, and parental authority.
Dodge GA
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1978; 1978(2):380-407. PubMed ID: 11664962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The conflict between "disabling" and "enabling" paradigms in law: sterilization, the developmentally disabled, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Dugan JC
Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 78(3):507-42. PubMed ID: 11659683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough.
Estacio RA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Sterilisation, the mentally ill and consent to treatment.
Fortin JE
Mod Law Rev; 1988 Sep; 51(5):634-42. PubMed ID: 11659136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparing German and English law on non-consensual sterilisation: a difference in approach.
Little GB
Med Law Rev; 1997; 5(3):269-93. PubMed ID: 11657490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Developments--the family. V. Procreative rights.
Harv Law Rev; 1980 Apr; 93(6):1296-308. PubMed ID: 11665179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
